Other - Politics & Government - September 2007

2007-09-13 05:59:19 · 9 answers · asked by Danny G 1

The planes looked different than passanger planes. I didn't see any windows and there was a wierd thing attached to the bottom of the planes, like a launch tube.

Just before they hit I saw a flash go off on the front of the plane like an explosion before it actually went into the building and blew up.

Later on after the planes hit, I heard explosions and as the buildings came down I heard boom - boom like detonators going off.

Then later I was standing over by building seven and I heard some reporter say on the news that building seven had collapsed - but it didn't, it was still standing. Then I heard some guy on a emergency radio say "pull it", why did he say that. Then the building came down. That was the wierdest thing that day! But no one wants to talk about it!

And why was the military flying a terrorist exercise where they pretend hijacker were flying planes into buildings, at the exact time terrorists were flying planes into our buildings?

100,000,000,000 to 1

2007-09-13 05:57:57 · 32 answers · asked by scottanthonydavis 4

It is impossible

That has been proven

You Neocon trolls all keep saying -"I was there, I saw the planes hit"!

So did all of us. Then we saw 90% of the jet fuel brun off at the second of impact. Then we heard a firefighter on his radio say that the fire wasn't that bad and that if they could get something on it they could put it out. Then we saw buldings freefall into their own footprints in less than 10 seconds.

Then we found out that the steel used in those buildings were tested in heat much hotter than jet fuel and that it didn't effect them.

Then we found no plane wreckage at the Pentagon

Then we found no plane wreckage in Pennsylvania

Then we found out the Pentgon went out of their way to confiscate video footage from businesses across the street

Then we found out they found the compounds of Thermite, a chemical explosive used to demolish buildings

Then we found out Firefighters and Police radioed hearing mulitple explosions after the planes already hit

2007-09-13 05:37:27 · 10 answers · asked by scottanthonydavis 4

Here is the way that the Supreme Court explained it in a 1947 case called Everson v. Board of Education. I am going to enumberate these 7 sentences, which the Court did not do in 1947.
1) Neither a state nor the Federal Government can set up a church.
2) Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another.
3) Neither can force nor influence a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion.
4) No person can be punished for entertaining or professing religious beliefs or disbeliefs, for church attendance or non-attendance.
5) No tax in any amount, large or small, can be levied to support any religious activities or institutions, whatever they may be called, or whatever form they may adopt to teach or practice religion.

To be continued, .....

2007-09-13 05:35:23 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-13 05:15:22 · 4 answers · asked by moshood1230 1

A. George Bush, he has omnicient powers that send hurricanes to New Orleans, he probably used them to spill my milk.
B. Dick Cheney, because I had to dodge an errant bullet, and he will give the milk clean up contract to Halliburton.
C. The big milk corporation fat cats, because they did not put milk carton gripping instructions on the carton.
D. Ronald Reagan, because the cost of milk went up under his administration, as did the price of everything else. He really messed up all of Jimmy Carters hard work.
E.

2007-09-13 05:05:07 · 17 answers · asked by Yahoo Answer Angel 6

I only ask this because I heard his program the other day, and I could not help but notice the slurred speech and hysterical laughter at his own drolleries. Also, he sounded frequently out of breath.

2007-09-13 04:48:29 · 9 answers · asked by Mr. Vincent Van Jessup 6

Why is the US so divided into 2 extremes that waste their time bashing the other side?
I mean, I'm not from there, and they way I see most of the questions on here, and things I read in the papers or watch on TV, it makes you guys look so ridiculous.
has all political thought been reduced to us vs them and black vs white?

i don't understand why everything has to be lumped into two sets of generalities. nothing is ever that simple. nothing.

I just think you guys should spend less time quarreling, and more time trying to fix and run your country correctly.

2007-09-13 04:37:19 · 27 answers · asked by Cristina 5

I've heard many reasons from the libs stating why the war is not making us safer but none to me are valid. No more attacks after 9/11 in our soil is enough to know that Bush is doing the right thing.
First of all, all these al-queda members and insurgents from different factions were there before the war (Middle East). Eventually at one point they were going to wake up no matter what.
Bush has been tough on these people, by going out there and catching or killing most of them including high ranking individuals. The war on terrorism is not just against Al-queda, it's on every terrorist. Extreme Sunnis, Shiites, and Kerds are also terrorists, so don't give me that we're not doing anything in Iraq.
Iran and Syria are the other two countries that should be next. These countries are a threat to us in every way. I do believe in talking to them but in the past we've all learned that talking to these people doesn't work and doesn't get things done.
War on terrorism is the future, reality

2007-09-13 04:17:10 · 13 answers · asked by Con4Life 3

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/republicans-introduce-measure-condemning-moveon-ad-2007-09-10.html

The anti-American right-wing Republicans in the House are really starting to show how unpatriotic they are nnow. Like their predecessor Joe McCarthy, they now want to abuse their high offices by trying to intimidate PRIVATE CITIZENS who express political views they don't like.

I have only one thing to say to them and their supporters: "HAVE YOU NO SHAME?"

2007-09-13 04:06:53 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blpic-demseal.htm

2007-09-13 03:49:13 · 3 answers · asked by bradxschuman 6

http://donsurber.blogspot.com/2007/09/hatch-on-move-on.html
This video was taken from C-SPAN.

Here is part of the transcript:"Now, anyone who has had the opportunity to meet the General, and anybody who has bothered to follow his career or his academic pursuits, knows that these are dangerous and unwarranted allegations. However, there might be a silver lining to this slander. Libel, really, because it was printed The New York Times. Now, all of America understands MoveOn.org and other groups like it are called the nutroots of our society. These people are nuts and they don't care who they hurt, they don't care who they smear they don't care who they libel. Politics is more important than anything else and power is the most important anything of all."

2007-09-13 03:33:51 · 10 answers · asked by Frank Dileo 3

list countries which have them

2007-09-13 03:09:16 · 2 answers · asked by louise h 1

OK this argument has been going on for a while in the Lab, actually a few weeks and we cant really come to any conclusion, So bring in your answers and facts or what ever.
Thanks

2007-09-13 02:36:49 · 28 answers · asked by alser 2

and the heroes and victims of that day? and shoud 9/11 be a national holiday?why or why not

2007-09-13 02:29:42 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Department of Housing and Urban Development
http://www.hud.gov/
or
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
http://www.nasa.gov/

2007-09-13 02:21:12 · 10 answers · asked by campbelp2002 7

2007-09-13 01:30:31 · 4 answers · asked by Mezmarelda 6

Plutonium 239 perhaps?

What exactly is it that you wish for?

2007-09-13 00:32:02 · 3 answers · asked by illiberal Illuminati 3

started this war because of all the wrong reasons?? do u belive iraq and 911 terrorists are linked? to anyone who really thought so is an idot. mr bush said so may lies to get to war with iraq and said were at war with the terroists when iraq as a whole had nothin to do with it. tell me what u think. if u think im wrong tell me why

2007-09-12 19:42:01 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

or gets one with substantial troop withdrawals as a requirement that he vetoes....does that not effectively cut funding for the war?

And can't the democrats then pass a specific bill with funding that can only be used to bring the soldiers home to get around the smear attempt that they left soldiers in battle with no bullets?

2007-09-12 18:39:35 · 8 answers · asked by ez f 1

2007-09-12 17:55:27 · 7 answers · asked by nikkaynjl 1

I've heard this term in the news

2007-09-12 17:43:17 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

in your own words please so I can understand it easily

2007-09-12 17:27:26 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-12 17:10:15 · 3 answers · asked by ? 6

so you keep ranting and raving that building 7 of the WTC collapsed from "shock waves" created by the other collapses.

Please tell us all why no other building collapsed? just magically building 7 and the twin towers? http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc7.html

how come no other buildings collapsed from "radiant shock waves" or were these schock waves you republicans speak of just happened to be aimed at building 7?

Anyone have a link or info on who the tenants of building 7 were? for that matter the tenants of WTC 1 and 2.

we already know who ran security for the WTC- http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/911security.html

so we have bush's little brother running security, a mgaical collapse of building 7, and all of a sudden an invasion into Iraq.

Let us not forget the no bid contracts to Haliburton. Not the fact that after 911 members of the bin laden family were allowed to fly out of America.

I mean call me a conspiracy theorist. But at least my eyes are open.

2007-09-12 17:05:28 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

I don't think it makes sense that Democrats support the murder of babies but do not think it is ok for two same gender people that love each other to spend the rest of their lives together. They will denounce same sex marriage in the name of religion but stick up for abortion? In God's eye I would have to think they are at least the same amount of sinning. Now I don't mean to open a debate about abortion, I know it is a very tough issue and nobody is actually FOR abortion. I just don't get why Democrats seem to have this double standard. It's ok to to apply your religious standards on gay couples but not pregnant women?

2007-09-12 15:23:35 · 22 answers · asked by BobbyDrake 2

2007-09-12 14:26:02 · 13 answers · asked by mikeleeiscool 1

Is the video of bush flipping off the camera before a speech real?

2007-09-12 13:28:55 · 15 answers · asked by i!i!i!i!i! 3

Terrorists have the ability to destroy a building or two and kill a bunch of people in one place. In my opinion that puts them on about the same scale as petty murderers and arsonists.

I don't understand why people are so afraid of them and even think that they could kill everyone in the US. Do they have an army? NO. Do they have great capabilities? NO. Are they pathetic? definitely.

At least people are no longer constantly asking if I want to die. We seem to be getting a little better.

What do you think?

2007-09-12 13:11:14 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-12 12:50:47 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous