It is impossible
That has been proven
You Neocon trolls all keep saying -"I was there, I saw the planes hit"!
So did all of us. Then we saw 90% of the jet fuel brun off at the second of impact. Then we heard a firefighter on his radio say that the fire wasn't that bad and that if they could get something on it they could put it out. Then we saw buldings freefall into their own footprints in less than 10 seconds.
Then we found out that the steel used in those buildings were tested in heat much hotter than jet fuel and that it didn't effect them.
Then we found no plane wreckage at the Pentagon
Then we found no plane wreckage in Pennsylvania
Then we found out the Pentgon went out of their way to confiscate video footage from businesses across the street
Then we found out they found the compounds of Thermite, a chemical explosive used to demolish buildings
Then we found out Firefighters and Police radioed hearing mulitple explosions after the planes already hit
2007-09-13
05:37:27
·
10 answers
·
asked by
scottanthonydavis
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
9/11 Conspiracies Debunked?
Oh, you mean all the articles and shows by Rupert Murdoch (Fox News- History Channel) and Hearst Corporation (Popular Mechanics),
Those are major right wing Neocon Corporations
Bush knows how to buy his Media and History re-writers doesn't he!
2007-09-13
06:03:33 ·
update #1
If you want to keep blaming the Saudi's - show me their names on any of the flight logs from that day!
LIARS
2007-09-13
06:05:15 ·
update #2
all you have to do is look at the pictures of the people standing in the impact hole, those people never would have survived the type of heat the official story told. impossible ,
but if it is to difficult to wrap your mind around this, go back to sleep and wait for your dream to end, the dream that every thing is as it appears to be...and the gov. is always right
the 9/11 drug is wearing off...oh yeah can any one tell me just how much of the fuel survived the initial fire ball-- none!
so then what you have is a class 1 fire wood, paper , furniture etc. now all you experts how hot does a class 1 fire get in uncontrolled conditions?\
and then there is the tempatures at ground zero of thousands of degrees weeks after the fact, was that jet fuel to?
2007-09-13 11:08:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by CHRIS S 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I invite anyone to do this experiment, but be very careful. Go to the gas station and buy a gallon of gas (or any flammable liquid you can get your hands on), take it to an area where a fire won't run the risk of spreading. Pour the gas out on a solid surface (concrete is ideal). Now try to light just part of it. Most of the fuel was consumed in the initial fireball, and the rest was consumed within a minute, it was an open fire, not a controlled fire. Open fires cannot possibly reach the same temperatures as controlled fires.
2007-09-13 05:50:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by mick t 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
this is a new one.
but over 20,000 pounds of jet fuel (per jet) does not burn off on impact.
also the second tower did not fall into it's own footprint - neither did the first for that matter - when they fell, they made a terrible mess that spanned over 40 acres.
but you are now also saying that you found some of the explosives used, what, unexploded? why would any of the explosives have been around after an explosion.
if conspiracy theorists want anyone to believe a word they say, then why don't they get a SINGLE MUNITIONS EXPERT to agree with what they say?
me, i'll continue to blame the SAUDIS for 9/11.
and as far as i'm concerned, conspiracy theorists are SAUDI APOLOGISTS.
there is a cover up regarding 9/11 - bush is protecting the people who have paid his family over $1,000,000,000.00 over the past 20 years.
2007-09-13 05:55:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by nostradamus02012 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
i'm happy to work out somebody else has a tricky time information how that ought to ensue, and why did the construction 7 (that housed each and all the place of work work for the completed Enron scandal) additionally fall whilst there became infrequently any structural injury, later that day at 5:30 ? besides, this became the 1st time in history that a metallic center construction went down from "warmth led to via hearth" and what do you comprehend, 3 homes of metallic went down that day! especially weird and wonderful....rather whilst different metallic homes have burned for as much as twenty hrs and that they did not fall.
2016-12-16 19:07:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Steel loses strength as it heats, which means the fire was hot enough to cause structural failure.
Once again, what is your source for that 'firefighter on his radio"?
Also, anyone with even minimal understanding of chemical reactions; burning is a reaction similar to rusting, knows that reactions can be slowed for a number of reasons including surface area. It seems unlikely that 90% of the fuel burned off on impact, because that requires 90% of the fuel to be exposed to oxygen, not just flame; you can't have an oxidizing reaction without oxygen, a lack of oxygen can keep anything from burning including jet fuel. And, let's say 90% did burn off that leaves you with between 500 and 1,000 gallons of fuel (between 2,273 liters and 4,546 litres). That is fuel enough to be an excellerant for the furnishings inside the tower.
Jet fuel typically burns at 260-315 °C (500-599 °F), but can reach 980 °C (1796 °F) under certain conditions. Steel loses 1/2 its strength at 1,000 degrees (F) and is only 1/10 as strong at 1,800 degrees (F) as it is at room temp.
What is that... http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/images/13.jpg
Why the aluminum skin of airliner.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.debunk911myths.org/
Let me guess, this is a government moutpiece as well so you're just going to dismiss it as well hugh? It must be easy to prove something when you ignore everything to contrary. Maggie Simpsons organzied 911, you can't tell me different because that means she is controlling you.
LEARN TO HAVE A REAL DEBATE!!!!!!
YOU ARE ACTING LIKE A DUMB KID!!!!!!!!
Straw man games are mid tricks, and do nothing to disprove what I said, GOOD DAY!
2007-09-13 06:00:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by 29 characters to work with...... 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
And then we woke up from that dream, and realized we live on Planet Earth, where the fuel did continue to burn and weaken the steel, where plane parts were found at the Pentagon, where plane parts were found in Pennsylvania.
And while we think back to the horrors of that day, we think how glad we are that we live in a society where even the most ill-informed paranoid nutjobs are free to speak their minds.
2007-09-13 05:44:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Teekno 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
Yes, the heat caused the towers to fall.
My god, how far will your lies go? Can you tell the truth about anything? "proven" "impossible" "neocon trolls" No problem, just make it up. ALL LIES I am quite sickened by the CT's demeaning the deaths of thousands with your lies. I just wish I could say what I really thought.
2007-09-13 05:57:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bleh! 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
OMG get a life- there is NO basis to any of your ranting, watch the many programmes that dissprove everything you have stated.....
I find these theories highly disrepectfull to all the families that lost someone that day and fighting the war on terror since!!
oh yeah and fuel does explode - and aircraft fuel is no exception
2007-09-13 05:49:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by NIknak 3
·
0⤊
4⤋
everything you just described in your question is refutted and rebuked if you go online and google "9/11 conspiracy debuked, refutted."
The good news is, when you do eventually grow up and look back at your question, you'll laugh as hard as you are making all us laugh right now.
2007-09-13 05:53:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Wayne G 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
WTF. I was on Church St. that day. Which, if you know your NYC geography, that would be across the street from the towers. Yeah, I saw it hit and felt it. And I ran. Grow up troll.
2007-09-13 05:43:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋