Other - Politics & Government - October 2006

I'm trying to get support for Kenneth Waltz's theory that the structure of the international system is based on anarchy and that major actors in the international system play a greater role than others. I know there were two world wars before this period but I dont know how to use this to answer the question? Please help Ive been working all day and this is stressing me out! :(

2006-10-31 05:17:59 · 1 answers · asked by Mariah D 1

i have heard most americans don't or they haven't been told what it is,i heard in the u.k their prime minister is takeing it very seriously and thinking of bringing out green taxes to ease the amount of carbon ommited in to our atmosphere, the main targets will be people who use 4x4's and a tax on flights.would americans adopt similar policies in the near future?

2006-10-31 05:02:42 · 15 answers · asked by mr_truth 1

Countries have a national product that they contribute to the world. As far as products being made, a lot of them are made or assembled in China or Japan. What is mexico's product or contribution to the world?

2006-10-31 04:17:59 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-31 04:04:05 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

I ask because the UK has transformed into just a market and as long as you make money, you are accepted. But is anything owed to those who don't fit into this, or are they the problem and they need to 'get with the programme'?

2006-10-31 03:35:46 · 8 answers · asked by Bob M 1

2006-10-31 03:34:55 · 5 answers · asked by Oh Tami !! 2

If the EU does file a complaint with the WTO protesting Japanese launch aid on the Boeing 787 aircraft, how might the Japanese retaliate? Given this what should Airbus urge the EU to do?

2006-10-31 03:31:55 · 3 answers · asked by Christina P 1

the u.k prime minister is going to step down in a years time, mostly cos of his denial with the war on iraq, why won't george bush do the same? hasn't he made enough money from the oil in iraq?

2006-10-31 03:23:04 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Instead of actually balancing the budget or paying for this war or for anything else, this administration builds up debt. Most of this debt is to China. So what is better: paying now or owing forever? How is that conservative, by the way?

2006-10-31 03:15:17 · 3 answers · asked by Schmorgen 6

Are their any other employee's who treat their paymasters with such contempt as the 600plus M.Ps. Given the millions they claim in salarys and expenses/junkets/freebees, one would think they could treat the tax payers with more honesty,courtesy and respect. Has any serving M.P got the guts to reply ?????????

2006-10-31 03:10:04 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

have the ACLU or the NAACP or some other whinning group have it banned this year?

2006-10-31 03:08:14 · 10 answers · asked by k c 1

Why do Americans feel the constant need to aid and assist foreign countries when we have the exact same problems on our own soil? For instance: I just read about Brad Pitt joining this alliance to go build homes in India for the poor...WE HAVE MILLIONS OF HOMELESS HERE!!! I just get so damn fed up with the way people think here. My motto is take care of your own first and then hand out what's left over, but that doesn't seem to be the way anyone else thinks. Am I crazy? And don't get me started with Iraq...

2006-10-31 02:58:18 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

After you anwser please explain

2006-10-31 02:48:19 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. All comments appreciated.

2006-10-31 02:42:12 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Because if you plan to win, you have to plan to leave unless you want Iraq to be a territory of US and no one has said that yet.

2006-10-31 02:40:42 · 6 answers · asked by Jose R 6

Why the panic? We were producing more CO2 back in the '50's than now - check here: http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ftp/trends/emissions/uki.dat
But the government have seen this as a chance to bump up the tax burden on the spurious 'Global Warming' ticket. Reducing the UK's CO2 emissions to zero wouldn't reduce the global greenhouse effect by any measurable amount. It's all balls!

2006-10-31 02:39:20 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Then put sanctions against its people so they starve to death, then tell them its for their own good. America has done this in Iraq, after the first Gulf War and do you think those sanctions effected Saddam, not one bit, they have had sanctions against Cuba and Vietnam as well, could it be that America are bad losers?

2006-10-31 02:19:52 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

can't cut taxes the list could go on and on) but never seem to emphasize the positive about what can be done

2006-10-31 02:10:14 · 14 answers · asked by Ynot! 6

i was wondering how you legally creat a country and set it apart from th country it was origanally in and all that simalar stuff,

in short i wanted to know what id hae to do to create a new country

2006-10-31 02:08:31 · 6 answers · asked by samson_everton 1

Only the educated and knowledgable, please. I've seen things like this go down badly, so let's exclude the "Israel sucks!" and "Iran sucks!" crowd: does anyone have a source to compare armies, strategies and likelihoods of victory between these two countries?

2006-10-31 02:07:09 · 13 answers · asked by Psychotic Clown 4

2006-10-31 01:35:39 · 4 answers · asked by bulabate 5

I just don't understand how Bush comes out and say that the democrats are going to takes us out of Iraq and increase taxes which is how you solve the deficit problem. Obviously he would do the opposite, to solve what problem? Self-esteem. I don't understand that campaign and how people fall for it. Is like he's campaigning for the democrats.
The question again, should the deficit be of our concern?

2006-10-31 01:31:55 · 5 answers · asked by Jose R 6

2006-10-31 01:18:21 · 5 answers · asked by dawnstvincent 1

2006-10-31 00:53:45 · 4 answers · asked by mason x 4

I'm tryin' to find the address or debate or statement Bush made to the Nation or the world just so I could answer this other cat's question. Can anyone help?

2006-10-31 00:49:48 · 5 answers · asked by Angelz Dagger 1

In my opinion they're complete imbecile's We're in debt because of their idiocy , If they were intelligent enough we Wouldn't HAVE DEBT.
The katrina Rescue was a complete failure , the guy who was in charge of it got fired , Well actually left , because he was going to get fired .

Every president always goes over budget , Which is stupid.

2006-10-31 00:48:10 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

And by the same token - will it increase or decrease should the Democrats not regain either Congress and the Senate?

Thanks.

2006-10-31 00:40:27 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-31 00:29:59 · 21 answers · asked by Dennis K 1

2006-10-31 00:15:34 · 2 answers · asked by jale_el 1

The British Govenment plan to introduce very stern green taxes to cut CO2 emissions. These include duty on carbon based fuel, and specific taxes an low-cost airlines.

Why doesn't the government ban the sale of cars with carbon based engines, and stop the electricity producers from using carbon based fuels. You could give them plenty of time, say 10 or 15 years - but surely this would force the organisations that can make a difference (the car manufacturers and the energy companies) to act.

They did this will catalytic converters in the 80s/90s so why not with carbon fuels?

What do you think - or is there a better option?

2006-10-31 00:04:24 · 16 answers · asked by mark 7