Because if you plan to win, you have to plan to leave unless you want Iraq to be a territory of US and no one has said that yet.
2006-10-31 02:40:42 · 6 answers · asked by Jose R 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
winning is not the objective. keeping it going is. remember bush announced victory in iraq in 2003. ummmmmm
2006-10-31 02:42:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It has to be about a long term contract with Halliburton/KBR due to the tremendous amount of profit to be made in weapons. More wars mean more weapons = huge profits.......
2006-10-31 10:48:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We must exit Iraq only when there is a government that is stable, and not willing allow the country to become a staging area for Islamic hegemony.
2006-10-31 10:49:21 · answer #3 · answered by dvdfgl 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We would of mopped up this operation if it were not for the politics behind this war .
We are not in it to win it but rather sustain it over a long period of time .
2006-10-31 10:43:20 · answer #4 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that's why we are still there but it sure does seem to work out nicely for Halliburton, doesn't it?
2006-10-31 10:43:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you want more Americans killed on American soil then we need to exit Iraq before we win the war.
2006-10-31 10:52:34 · answer #6 · answered by dakota29575 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋