Immigration - January 2007

I think that is horrible and that he should be fined. We need to pay with American money if we are in America!

2007-01-15 00:20:39 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-15 00:15:45 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

i have done 3yr poly tech diploma den distance bsc life science 4m ignou n have a work exp of 5 yrs i want to have work visa for usa or australia how can i get it easily .

2007-01-14 23:21:54 · 6 answers · asked by shiny 1

2007-01-14 22:56:57 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

For a long time our government had double standards in its polacy. It followed the Bully mentality as Might is Right instead of Right is Might. This what we get when we elect politicians who look for their own interes & not the interes of the country. They are too busy making dirty deals with lobbiest & selling to big corporations, instead of our needs. Look at New Orleans a year & a half later after Katrina. I think every politician in Washington should be kicked out of office.

2007-01-14 22:01:34 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am a Keralite and Residing in Kerala for past 31 years(Birth date is 19-05-1975) But My birth Place is at Khameria Jabalpur Madhya Pradesh because my Father was working there,Now I want my Birth Certificate from there in order to Migrate to Foriegn Country for job Can Anybody help Me how i get it from authorities and what are the procedures to get the certificate

2007-01-14 21:45:37 · 3 answers · asked by mot 1

I am an Asian women

2007-01-14 21:39:34 · 6 answers · asked by quickly pass 1

If I don't have an American passport or green card, would an offer of employment from a reputable professional firm be sufficient to allow me to stay in the country indefinitely (ie as long as I kept the job) or is it more complicated than that to be able to stay in the US longer than a normal visa would allow?

2007-01-14 21:13:54 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

Just saw this on the news today. Who says the terrorists aren't trying to come through the Mexican/US border?

2007-01-14 20:31:57 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Homeland Security in conjunction with the Federal District Attorney of Texas, is considering the possibility of filing Charges against the Unarmed National Guard troops which were attacked and forced to retreat at the Mexican Border last week.

“We believe there may be evidence that some of the troops involved did willfully and flagrantly fail to properly retreat fast enough according to the rules of engagement they have been ordered to follow.” A Homeland Security spoksperson probably said.
“Retreating in the face of armed aggression from our neighbor to the south is one of the Administrations’ highest priorites, but the speed and efficiency with which our troops are able to retreat continues to be an administration concern.”
National Guard Sgt. Edward Balaban. said “the troops withdrew safely, no shots were fired and no one suffered injuries.”
In a press conference shortly following the Guardsman’s retreat, Michael Chertoff failed to mention it, though He might have added:
” The Federal DA in Texas has been doing a great job putting those who are tasked with protecting us in jail where they belong. We have every reason to believe they will continue to do so……..Americans need to understand the complex issues involved confronting drug smugglers at our border……
There’s smugglers…….with guns and drugs…….invading our country on one side…….and our kids and families on the other side……..SEE……it’s just so complicated.”

2007-01-14 20:03:30 · 8 answers · asked by MinuteWoman 2

2007-01-14 19:58:11 · 20 answers · asked by JOSEPH J 2

does anyone know if the social security offices will be open tomorrow since it is MLK day????

2007-01-14 18:35:53 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-14 17:46:45 · 3 answers · asked by whateverbabe 6

Im an american that just recieved duel a duel citizenship to croatia .... what advantages or disadvantages do I know have as a duel citizen....thanking you all in advance

2007-01-14 17:28:56 · 5 answers · asked by m k 2

I've been reading a lot of really hateful and stupid questions about immigration, but I have a serious one. If the government decided to grant amnesty to illegal immigrants, do you think it would be a good idea to place them in a higher tax bracket for a period of time as opposed to people who come to country and work within the system to become citizens? Please leave any trailer trash threats out. I'm interested in serious replies only.

2007-01-14 17:15:39 · 6 answers · asked by tranquility_base3@yahoo.com 5

Note from A Study Of Our Decline by Philip Atkinson
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it Assimilation or Invasion?
by: Phyllis Schlafly
November 28, 2001
Since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, support for the United States has poured in from around the world, but the response from Mexico has been decidedly lukewarm. A Gallup poll reported that 78 percent of Mexicans oppose contributing troops to a multinational coalition, and we have seen no indication that Mexico will modify its oil policy of acting like a member of OPEC.

While there is no evidence that the 9/11 terrorists entered over the Mexican border, the trial in El Paso of an Iraqi smuggler produced evidence that he alone brought more than 1,000 Middle East illegals into the United States via that route, charging his clients $10,000 to $15,000 each. Border Patrol agents have confirmed the increase in illegal aliens coming from the Middle East across our southern border and the fact that Arabs pay up to $50,000 each for a "coyote" to smuggle them into the United States.

The 9/11 events have temporarily shelved the foolish proposals to grant amnesty to three million Mexicans illegally living in our country. Unfortunately, there is no indication that Mexico has retreated from its longtime goal of opening the U.S. border.

In Chicago on July 27, 1997, then Mexican President Ernesto Zedilla told the National Council of LaRaza, "I have proudly affirmed that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders." He announced a Mexican constitutional amendment that purports to allow Mexicans to retain their Mexican nationality even though they become U.S. citizens (which is contrary to the U.S. naturalization oath).

When President Vicente Fox came to the United States this year, he reiterated this line, proclaiming that "the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders" and includes migrants living in the United States. He called for open borders and endorsed Mexico's new dual citizenship law.

Some Mexicans use the term "reconquista," which is Spanish for reconquest, to describe their desire to see California, New Mexico, Arizona and Texas acquired by Mexico and named the new country of Aztlan. They are teaching their youth that the United States "stole" those areas from Mexico and that they should be "returned."

The United States acquired the Southwest a century and a half ago in three ways: part by the 1845 annexation agreement with Texas, which was then an independent republic, part ceded by Mexico in the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo after the Mexican-American War, and part by the 1852 Gadsden Purchase

Mexico's claim to the Southwest originated with the 1494 Treaty of Tordesillas, which drew an imaginary line on the map to divide the Western Hemisphere between Spain and Portugal. Because geography had so many unknowns at that time, Portugal got only Brazil (which is why Brazilians speak Portuguese).

Other countries never recognized this treaty, and Americans consider it ridiculous even to talk about giving the Southwest to Mexico. Most national borders all over the world have come about as the result of war.

Mexicans obviously have no thought of invading the Southwest with troops, so their hope is reconquista by migration, both legal and illegal. According to Mario Obledo, founder of the Mexican American Legal Defense & Education Fund, "California is going to be a Hispanic state and anyone who doesn't like it should leave."

An amnesty rally in the Los Angeles Sports Arena on June 10, 2000 attracted 25,000 people. In demanding amnesty for illegal Mexican aliens, the speakers proudly announced the names of at least a dozen unions in Los Angeles that are now headed by Mexicans.

Vicente Fox presented Mexico's Congress with a five-year development plan to eliminate the U.S.-Mexican border. He said he plans to serve "the 100 million Mexicans who now live in Mexico and the more than 18 million who live abroad," and to "strengthen our ability to protect and defend the rights of all Mexicans abroad."

Juan Hernandez, appointed by Fox as special liaison to Mexicans abroad, lobbies to get U.S. driver's licenses issued to illegal aliens and defends the Mexican government's issuance of desert survival kits to those sneaking across the border. On ABC's Nightline on June 7, he boasted: "We are betting that the Mexican-American population in the United States ... will think Mexico first."

Fox's five-year plan calls for building a larger consular presence in the United States, and this is already in operation. In U.S. areas with large Hispanic (including illegal) populations, the Mexican consul donates to the local public schools the same textbooks that are used in every elementary school in Mexico, grades 1 through 6.

The books, written in Spanish and including all academic subjects, teach that America "stole" the southwest from Mexico and that Mexico is entitled to take it back. The Mexican government considers these textbooks a symbol of Mexican national pride, guarantees a set to every Mexican child, and makes it a crime for anyone to sell them.

The only reason we learned about this Mexican plan is that one school in Santa Ana, California, decided to sell the books at a book fair and the local Hispanics kicked up a fuss about it. The school apologized to the Hispanics for selling the books, but should have apologized to the students for accepting the books in the first place.

The question we should ask our Mexican immigrant friends is, are you assimilating or invading?

Home Main Contents

2007-01-14 17:13:07 · 12 answers · asked by fivefootnuttinhuny 3

May Day is used by Communist nations to promote their way of Life. In America, it is one of the most hated day. Not only because of its communist connotation, but that many who wish to overthrough the American government, has used it to promote their agenda and to initiate violence. Since the 50's it has become a day to show hatred towards America and its way of life. Immigrant support groups choose that day to hold protest. I personnally don't believe in coincidence. I also am divided on the immigration issue, since they do improve the economy, but they also lower wages . I doubt the majority of the immigrants know the significance of May day, but I do believe there are a few who should. I did check wikipedia on my facts and do understand that Western Europeans celebrate it as labor day but they still have a socialistic attitude towards this holiday. If you are not American, please state your nation of origin. For Americans, please state your immigration status.

2007-01-14 16:54:41 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

In the USA it is required to carry ID at all times already so wouldn't this solve many problems of today

2007-01-14 16:28:16 · 6 answers · asked by StayBeZe 4

Does anyone know if you get your student visa approved the same day as your embassy interview (especially in New Delhi)?

2007-01-14 16:26:38 · 1 answers · asked by Jazmin 2

Can I get in trouble if I capture them and hold them till immigration comes

2007-01-14 16:22:04 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

my buddie filmed it, he was invited by some contractor that did some work at his house to play golf, he didnt expect the illegals to sneak in the roosters and fight them there.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=nCcLNoip5Aw

2007-01-14 16:18:48 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

There are or will soon be Hispanic majorities in some states, illegal and otherwise. What will the quota be for non hispanic's. Will they then do the jobs they won't now?

2007-01-14 15:57:11 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

It's not like i agreed... but often hispanic families allow relatives to come and stay with them. So, what do you say?

2007-01-14 15:48:02 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

if i can visit home within a certain time, also i need to get a medical but where do i get this done.

2007-01-14 15:47:13 · 4 answers · asked by bri d 2

2007-01-14 15:31:01 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

Well I guess so if you live in Santa Ana California. Its quite popular for the illegals to hang a goat by its legs and slit its throat. Streets are shut down for mass butchary, dozens of animals are screaming and bleeding in front of other poeples homes. Could it possibly be that just mabey, thats not acceptable or just another lack of tolerance by the racists...?

2007-01-14 15:01:38 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why or why not?

Only a few European countries still grant automatic citizenship at birth. The United Kingdom and Australia repealed their U.S.-style policies in the 1980s after witnessing abuses similar to those plaguing the U.S. today.

Should the illegal parents of US born babies be allowed to stay? Why or why not.

2007-01-14 15:00:42 · 31 answers · asked by eccentricmommy 3

Explain your answer please

2007-01-14 15:00:39 · 8 answers · asked by super_duper_jojo 2

Like Unknown entrances?

2007-01-14 14:59:07 · 11 answers · asked by super_duper_jojo 2

2007-01-14 14:49:56 · 21 answers · asked by ♥ Scorpio X 3