English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Homeland Security in conjunction with the Federal District Attorney of Texas, is considering the possibility of filing Charges against the Unarmed National Guard troops which were attacked and forced to retreat at the Mexican Border last week.

“We believe there may be evidence that some of the troops involved did willfully and flagrantly fail to properly retreat fast enough according to the rules of engagement they have been ordered to follow.” A Homeland Security spoksperson probably said.
“Retreating in the face of armed aggression from our neighbor to the south is one of the Administrations’ highest priorites, but the speed and efficiency with which our troops are able to retreat continues to be an administration concern.”
National Guard Sgt. Edward Balaban. said “the troops withdrew safely, no shots were fired and no one suffered injuries.”
In a press conference shortly following the Guardsman’s retreat, Michael Chertoff failed to mention it, though He might have added:
” The Federal DA in Texas has been doing a great job putting those who are tasked with protecting us in jail where they belong. We have every reason to believe they will continue to do so……..Americans need to understand the complex issues involved confronting drug smugglers at our border……
There’s smugglers…….with guns and drugs…….invading our country on one side…….and our kids and families on the other side……..SEE……it’s just so complicated.”

2007-01-14 20:03:30 · 8 answers · asked by MinuteWoman 2 in Politics & Government Immigration

Rules are illegals should not cross the border but you hug them and love them when they do. When some more 9-11 thugs blow up America think about the rules

2007-01-14 20:17:09 · update #1

8 answers

Wow what a surprise just another example of our government getting it all wrong. If anything the national guard should be armed and able to return fire if fired upon! Let's continue to let illegal aliens cross our border so we can continue to support the people who have entered our country illegally. And let me say one final thing amnesty for ILLEGALS is a joke, if they want to enter our country then they can do it legally! May GOD grant our government balls to enforce our laws.

2007-01-14 20:22:52 · answer #1 · answered by jason s 4 · 2 1

There are enough real events on our borders to be concerned about without muddying up the issue with a satire.

One such is the incursion into our country by armed military or paramilitary Mexican forces, which our guardsmen were permitted only to observe, not engage.

2007-01-14 20:55:09 · answer #2 · answered by Helmut 7 · 1 0

i imagine it is because this style of number of people come for the period of it in accordance to annum, and many fewer come by skill of the Canadian border. notwithstanding, in accordance to a modern-day state branch document, they are worried about suspected terrorists getting into Canada lower than asylum and staging for terrorist attacks. i do not recognize noticeably what that they had in concepts, yet i imagine we favor to protect both borders. regrettably, Canada and the northern states attempt to bypass any incorrect way and get the authorities to placed off using the passports with biometric archives that are meant to be in use between the U. S. and Canada as of 2008. I comprehend their standpoint. there is virtually no crime in a number of those northern states, and persons do not even lock their houses. Locking the rustic looks ridiculous to them. It should be achieved, notwithstanding.

2016-10-31 03:36:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Peter is right thems da rules

2007-01-14 20:11:03 · answer #4 · answered by josh m 5 · 1 0

If these terms of engagement are true, whoever made them should be boiled in oil. So should the D.A.

2007-01-14 20:47:08 · answer #5 · answered by scallywag 3 · 1 0

Why do they even have national guards if the only thing they are allowed to do is retreat..... I agree this is stupid....

2007-01-14 20:22:05 · answer #6 · answered by AlienJack J 3 · 1 1

Hey rules is rules

2007-01-14 20:09:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

*sigh* I agree. Complete bull, friend.

2007-01-14 20:11:37 · answer #8 · answered by rissagirl05 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers