Government - April 2007

Shades of Katrina.

2007-04-19 04:01:50 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Some of my recollections,

Bill Clinton, he lied to the grand jury under oath.
Was charged with sexual harrasment of an employee and while under investigation he went on TV and lied to the largest audience ever to witness a lie.
He did not have the decency to call Monica by name, he had so many stories some true and some false that make a person wonder how he could stay out of jail let alone in public office.
Remember selling the whitehouse to the highest bidder? Letting people pay to sleep in the Lincoln bedroom, how about pardons for cash.
We have such a short memory, but we will be graced with this shyster and his loving wife again soon.share with me some stories you have heard.
Libs line up to bash me I love it!!!!!!!

2007-04-18 21:24:51 · 15 answers · asked by Jack L. W. 3

2007-04-18 21:16:02 · 6 answers · asked by steele_cd 1

2007-04-18 21:06:59 · 9 answers · asked by steele_cd 1

2007-04-18 21:04:34 · 16 answers · asked by steele_cd 1

I have read the basic tenents of his presentation already, and I am IMPRESSED, because he apparently will withhold nothing.

He will present the whole sordid Iraqi bucket of worms (without lies), beginning with pre-911 times, which alot of us haven't taken the time to explore...

Might be worth watching --for truths' sake.

2007-04-18 19:06:22 · 10 answers · asked by charly 3

I saw this poll on the myfoxla.com website and thought it was interesting.

I'm a little confused though---- Does gun control mean that we want more restrictions on who can get a gun or does it mean we want less restrictions?

Please answer the initial question and provide any information you can give me to clarify. Thank you!

----------------------Survey Taken from the MyFoxLA.com Website----------------------

Does the Virginia Tech tragedy change your opinion on gun control?

Poll Results:
Yes, we need increased gun control 7.33%
Yes, we need less gun control 77.15%
No, it doesn't change my opinion either way 15.52%
Total number of votes: 2714

2007-04-18 17:41:28 · 11 answers · asked by i!i!i!i!i! 3

It seems that the salaries of those who work for the UN are high. A lot of the police/soldiers who work for it are from developing countries where the police/military are corrupt so there must be a lot of corrupt police/soldiers getting good pay from the UN. I've heard that half of the funding into the UN goes to corruption in the countries its projects are located.

2007-04-18 17:31:02 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Democrats should lead a movement to rid the nation of automatic weapons and Republicans. Both are a danger to our society. One kills, the other creates massive deficits then wish to pass bonds for the rich to finance the defecits. The poor get to pay back the bonds. We need President Pelosi to right the course of the nation. 2 resignations will solve our problems.

2007-04-18 17:18:40 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Your thoughts as to whether the Executive brance has been allowed to assume more authority than allowed by the Constitution.

2007-04-18 15:50:26 · 4 answers · asked by david o 6

how do you become Supervisor of elections in your county?

2007-04-18 14:35:14 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-18 14:07:54 · 12 answers · asked by Micah L 1

When we have elections, the candidates always speak about family values and how much they care about the welfare of the American people. Let's inquirer about why with their own wealth and family values they have not reached out and saved one child in foster care. In so many cases these chilren are neglected, sexually abused, and just not loved

2007-04-18 12:22:46 · 3 answers · asked by jean 7

The State of California has prison over population problems. There are some other states with similar issues and in all states a lot of money is put into housing prisoners. Well the people of Iraq need jobs, need something to sustain their economy, and flying prisoners there wouldn't really be that expensive. Plus if we put them in orange jump suits they probably won't want to escape right? And if we built them on the border with Iran we could monitor illegal border crossings as well! Its a total win win situation - why not?

2007-04-18 10:47:51 · 5 answers · asked by netjr 6

2007-04-18 10:12:03 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

What is it exactly that people expect from the president? good gracious, come on people, no one is perfect. He's doing what he can. but just out of curiosity... what is it that people expect from the president? and do you think that the medias portrayl of him effects how we think of him? (PLEASE DO NOT ANSWER THIS IF YOU AREN'T POLITICAL AND YOU'RE REALLY JUST A STUPID COMMON JERK)

2007-04-18 08:21:23 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

How do you think the states/regions might realign?
- as before?
- blue states/ red states?
- other?

(purely a hypothetical sci-fi scenario)

2007-04-18 07:50:58 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

All the libs and democrats state that G.W. Bush is destroying our Constitutional rights, but yet he support the "Right to Keep and Bear Arms". A right that was formulated to prevent the government from becoming a dictatorship, to be used for self and common defence.

2007-04-18 06:51:38 · 17 answers · asked by timberland1952 3

If you receive food stamps do you claim this as income on your taxes as the end of the year? I've been searching online and can't seem to find any answers regarding this. Thank You!

2007-04-18 06:50:06 · 6 answers · asked by Ric W 1

I mean no disrespect for what happened at VT. I am only asking to know how we can better the out come of situations like this in the future.

It seems to me that if 30 people would have rushed him that he wouldn't have been able to kill all 30 people.

2007-04-18 06:48:16 · 20 answers · asked by Thomas B 3

Every time something goes wrong in society, the Liberals want to rush to more restrictive, right reducing laws.

2007-04-18 06:32:15 · 13 answers · asked by timberland1952 3

I would like to contact that person to ask them about their tools and methodology. If you have their email address, that would be great.
Thanks!

2007-04-18 06:15:18 · 2 answers · asked by stubby 1

I give you VT, had one student been armed they might have stopped that lunatic. It is obvious the police aren't going to protect you...how many police were there, hiding behind trees and garbage dumpsters while he kept shooting. It is up to each of us to protect ourselves, our families and our friends. Perhaps if the judges would incarcerate gun criminals harder and the parole boards would deny repeat offenders parole the streets would be safer. I live in a part of the country that rarely sees law enforcement, I'm talking about 15 minute wait for assistance, my handgun and "assault rifle" is my only line of defense. For those of you looking at Europe for an answer, I give you Switzerland, where every adult has a MACHINE GUN and ample ammunition and the fact that Europes violent crime rates are increasing every year. So, you give up your handgun, and rely on an overworked, overstretched police force to protect you, and I will watch out for you obituary in the papers.

2007-04-18 06:14:55 · 25 answers · asked by Armed Civilian 4

2007-04-18 03:58:29 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Aren't most freedoms limited in this country?

Even though guns are legal, I am limited to what guns I can buy. I can't buy an assult weapon.

So why shouldn't abortion be limited as long as it is still legal?

2007-04-18 03:44:38 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

I always wondered, why we would have people decide about our countries future, if they have reached their zenit 20 years ago and now just wait to die. Supreme court judges, Presidents, Generals, Senators.... If you know, you are not going to see the results of your bad decisions, why would you care?

2007-04-18 03:30:41 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-18 03:23:58 · 13 answers · asked by crystal c 1

apply the logic of the movie Minority Report, everyone submits to neurological testing to see if they will commit a crime in the future, then we just eliminate or incarcerate them for the rest of their lives.

For those who want to change a constitutional amendment because you do not like it, should we just eliminate all of them and start from scratch, you know put it to a majority vote?

You cannot diddle with one amendment only, just because you do not like it, others may feel you should not be able to speak your mind publicly.

2007-04-18 02:10:37 · 4 answers · asked by rmagedon 6

2007-04-18 01:03:40 · 5 answers · asked by Princess Karena 2

2007-04-17 17:41:30 · 15 answers · asked by j t 1