English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Government - February 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Government

I just read a quote of John Howard's in the 2.26.07 issue of Time magazine where he says "If I was running Al-Qaeda in Iraq, I would put a circle around March 2008 and pray, as many times as possible, for a victory not only for Obama but also for the Democrats".

This was in response to a statement by Barack Obama that if he's elected he would pull out all the troops by March 2008.

2007-02-23 06:08:54 · 2 answers · asked by Sean 7

WHY CAN'T THE GOVT. DO THEIR WORK HONESTLY?????????

2007-02-23 06:05:29 · 2 answers · asked by pramod mahajan 1

2007-02-23 05:51:09 · 2 answers · asked by juliah_mgm 1

A flammable hydrocarbon such as jet-A burns under optimal conditions (with air forced into the combustion chamber) at 1,800F. In an open air fire it will burn at about 1,200F. Structural steel doesn't melt until 3,332F. Video footage shows molten steel pouring out of the gaping wound in one of the towers. Statements, recorded on video by the Naudet brothers' documentary, of firefighters on the scene that day talked about "molten steel running down the channel rails" and how it was "like being in a foundry". Sturctural steel CAN NOT be melted by a hydrocarbon. Period. How did jet-A melt sturctural steel? If a building suffers a pancake collapse, the fastest rate of destruction possible is 6 floors per second. That would mean that the 110 story buildings should have taken at least 18.3 seconds. Newton's 2nd Law applied to an object dropped from a 110 story building would take 9.4 seconds to hit the pavement. WTC 1 fell in 8.6 seconds. WTC 2 fell in 10.4 seconds. How?

2007-02-23 05:16:17 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Does the old president stay over a couple days and train the new president

2007-02-23 05:15:16 · 12 answers · asked by Jonathan S 2

Bush is a traitor to the Spirit of the United States.

Our economic system is based on mercantilism. Our system of laws are based of the Bible and democracy. If we are a people of God then why do we base are every move worldwide on our economic power and very little on our system of laws. Basically when people threaten our economic stabiilty and say bad stuff in Iraq about us we attack with full power top protect our economic interest but when people are being slaughtered in Bosnia or dying in the Sudan of hunger then those same people who were so ready to go to war to protect our economic interest are silent when there is talk of protecting the weak and enblazening the Spirit of the United States.

Am I a traitor as Ann Coulter put it???

2007-02-23 05:10:36 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-23 05:01:34 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

I will avoid the award show.

I have no interest in watching it.

2007-02-23 04:47:27 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-23 04:23:30 · 4 answers · asked by olen h 1

the government dont have any money-it's ours.They just spend,spend,spend it.Now ''government spending this year will be.....'' is correct and they waste/spend lots of it too!!!!!!!!

2007-02-23 04:03:28 · 11 answers · asked by pasky 2

2007-02-23 03:42:06 · 5 answers · asked by Ivan 4

2007-02-23 03:41:15 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

We only have the right to vote on state and local matters!

2007-02-23 03:23:17 · 2 answers · asked by bigh5586 2

2007-02-23 03:12:29 · 6 answers · asked by Garrett S 3

Just wondering how many events, and what.

2007-02-23 01:26:31 · 7 answers · asked by kool_rock_ski_stickem 4

2007-02-23 00:30:12 · 4 answers · asked by William H 1

Eenadu, Andhra Pradesh's most reputed media brand, writes about corruption of the AP government, worse still, exposing corruption within the CM's family. I have every reason to trust Eenadu's authenticity in whatever it has to say. In reply, the Govt plans to pin down one of the Usodaya (The mother-company of Eenadu)'s firms, Margadarsi Financiers (Not to be confused with Margadarsi Chit Funds), and 'proclaim' it illegal, against RBI norms.
RBI has already given the firm their clean chit, the depositors have no objections whatsoever against the company, furthermore they stage a demonstration in support of the company.

The bigger issue I'm asking is: Is the government and Indian Legislative as a whole, developing a fascist kind of mentality, where the ruler takes it all, and the onlooker cannot even speak against it?

2007-02-23 00:07:40 · 4 answers · asked by K-Paxian 2

2007-02-23 00:03:28 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-22 23:50:20 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Just a few days ago Blair and his Government, announced that some of our troops will soon be coming home from Iraq,- well about 1,600 of them. We know they are not being brought home because the job has been completed - it is just another attempted PR excercise by Blair to cover himself and because of the further ongoing problems in Afghanistan! We would be stupid to believe our remaining troops have not been put in further danger by this bad judgment by Blair and his colleagues.
Now guess what? Tony Blair has today announced that an extra 1000 troops are being sent to Afganastan. When will this bent Government realise they cannot keep fooling us ?

2007-02-22 22:27:42 · 12 answers · asked by Whistler R 5

Is it good? Or democratic is much better? What are the things that parliament can provide that the democrat can’t and vise versa?

2007-02-22 22:20:09 · 7 answers · asked by Its me! 2

Equal to US president?
Finance minister?

People in South East Asia had no idea who this person does?

Ivan,
South East Asia

2007-02-22 21:01:48 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Presiding officer in indian governemnt

2007-02-22 20:28:18 · 3 answers · asked by doctornilam 2

Example: You all know what I'm going to say! right?
New Orleans sits in a mud pit, oil rigs are back and running and gas prices are still above the roof.
And dont be picky with details you know exactly what I'm talking about!

2007-02-22 19:43:58 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

YOU AGREE WITH ME THAT ALL OF US HAVE A GREAT REGARD FOR OUR PRESIDENT DR.A.P.J.ABDUL KALAM. PREPARING AN ELECTION MANIFESTO,GOING TO THE PEOPLE ,FACING ELECTIONS ,FORMING THE GOVERNMENT ETC ARE THE PREROGATIVES OF THE PRIME MINISTER BACKED BY HIS PARTY AND THE PM IS TO BE LAUDED FOR THE ACHIEVEMENTS AND ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE LAPSES IF ANY.
BUT,THE PRESIDENT IS A CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY, ONLY TO STEP IN TO TAKE CHARGE OF THE GOVERNMENT IN CASE OF ANY UNFORSEEN CRISES AND THEREFORE PRESIDENT CALLING HIS GOVERNMENT MAY NOT BE RIGHT.
KINDLY CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG.

2007-02-22 19:29:00 · 5 answers · asked by NQS 5

fedest.com, questions and answers