Government - February 2007

2007-02-24 00:16:53 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-23 22:59:32 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Bill Clinton administration was respected and revered throughout the world. Now everyone in the world thinks that most of the americans are imperialistic subhuman scum with a desire to bring the world's end. Everyone knows that there are draft avoiders and awols ruling america today. And many people think that americans deserve WHAT IS ABOUT TO COME AT THEM!!!

2007-02-23 22:40:19 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Iraq and 'The son of Star Wars' missile defence programme are the most prominent examples i can think of. We settled our debts with the US last year when the loan that they lended us in 1947 was paid off, so why is this government following old patterns of behaviour when it comes to global strategy?

2007-02-23 22:35:31 · 7 answers · asked by IshotJR 2

You don;t really hear much about what's happen with the man responsible for for 9/11. Can anyone explain why he is still out there? With all the spies and top secret stuff the goverment has you would think they would have him by now or at least have some clue.

2007-02-23 20:52:05 · 11 answers · asked by tommyhawk 2

2007-02-23 20:02:47 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

George Washington or Abreham Lincoln

2007-02-23 20:00:37 · 16 answers · asked by desmondo999 1

I know learned Hillary and Bill are, and so far I haven't heard about Edwards or Biden---and if by some chance of GOD someone not from the secret societies DOES get elected- his whole congress WOULD BE---would a pres without any backing in the houses be able to stop this insance wrong doing for the righteous almighty dollar? Could some get into office and SAVE this planet? and who do you suggest?

2007-02-23 19:57:02 · 13 answers · asked by mac 6

2007-02-23 18:19:25 · 6 answers · asked by mayank s 1

2007-02-23 16:51:37 · 14 answers · asked by vinoth k 1

2007-02-23 16:49:44 · 7 answers · asked by ramadevi_gopi 1

2007-02-23 16:47:02 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

As an Iranian girl, 23 years old, The long support of USA officials of countries government of Saudi Arabia?
and Pakistan is not comprehensive for me at all.
While Saudi Arabia had a major role in 911 catastrophe , infact, 11 of 15 of 911 highjackers have been sponsored by this country, Iranian residents were among the few Muslim countries that hold demonstration on 9 11.
Secondly , polls is indicative of the fact that most Saudis are hostile toward Americans 11 in contrast with Iranians who are proAmericans .
In my country , more freedom have been given to women compare to other Muslim counties in middle east , women are allowed to drive , vote and run for office and 65 % of Iran university are women to the sharp contrast with country Saudi Arabia that in their country women have been deprived from the very basic rights of a human being.
Saudi Arabia helped finance the Taliban. Saudi Arabia private charities help sustain Al Qaeda as well and 90 % of American troops casualties has been caused by Sunni insurgencies financed and backed by Saudi Arbia and Pakistan. I do not deny my government interference in Iraq and though, I would not support their doings in Iraq that has been largely exaggerated by Bush and friends, I would understand their reasons that why they desire this time to have a more friendlier regime in Iraq and that why they strongly desire not have to struggle with another hostile regime like Saddam backed by U.S once more . In total , I think , American neocons are not searching for peace and stability in middle east but quite on the contrary they strongly support terrorism and extremism and their support of the two countries of Saudi and Pakistan is well indicative of this fact.
My question is that why should not Iran with more democrat government and pro American people have the support of USA instead of Saudi Arabia whose people are extremely hostile towards Americans ?
About Nuclear power, Iran is not developing nuclear weaponry unlike Pakistan with people whose 90 % of suicide bombers have been financed and supported by them.About Nuclear power, Iran is not developing nuclear weaponry unlike Pakistan with people whose 90 % of suicide bombers have been financed and supported by them.
Iran has the second largest population of Jews after Israel unlike countries like Saudi Arabia whose government do not allow religion diversity

2007-02-23 16:33:22 · 15 answers · asked by shadab a 2

2007-02-23 16:29:13 · 7 answers · asked by sunflare63 7

2007-02-23 16:27:56 · 19 answers · asked by sunflare63 7

2007-02-23 15:41:11 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-23 15:13:38 · 12 answers · asked by richard r 1

Such as Keith Ellison or someone. I personally wouldn't know who to trust anymore. No offense to anyone.

2007-02-23 14:56:04 · 12 answers · asked by Addicted To Abercrombie & Fitch 2

you'll criticize the politicians for not taking a position but resist taking one yourself.

2007-02-23 14:51:23 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Out of Barrack Obama, Hilary Clinton, and (sorry, I don't know the guy's name) The other guy running.


I personally think that Barrack Obama should be the next president, because he seems like a genuinely kind guy, and I think that he could make excellent decisions for our country.

2007-02-23 14:38:03 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

how much or how many is too much? especially those who support the war.....do you have a limit or is this a one-way ride and you'll hang on regardless of the results?

2007-02-23 14:37:39 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Not every family on welfare is lazy or addicted to drugs, and welfare actually helps the economy out.

so why, exactly, do so many people hate others being on welfare?

2007-02-23 14:17:06 · 21 answers · asked by blank 3

Identify the legislation that is linked to the issue and explain why there is a connection. I am thinking of how to use the NAGPRA (Native American Grave Protection and Repatriation Act). I am not sure how to put it into words. Is the NAGPRA the legislation? and are the current issues the fact that non-natives are wanting to keep sacred bones, funerally items, and special tribal things, while the federal government wants to keep them? Am I understanding this or am I getting it all wrong? I need help! This is a college assignment due tonight and I have researched so much and I am so confused. Can someone please provide details and help me to understand? Thanks so much in advance!

2007-02-23 14:09:18 · 5 answers · asked by Christina J 2

2007-02-23 13:59:35 · 2 answers · asked by Star M 3

The legendary stupidity of George W. Bush, whose rich parents and crony friends bought him passing grades and much more, or the incompetence of Federal Emergency Management Agency bureaucrats during Hurricane Katrina in 2005 are both strong arguments against this view.

“I think we are welcomed,” said Bush when asked about Vice President Dick Cheney’s predictions that U.S. troops would be greeted with thanks by Iraqis. “But it was not a peaceful welcome.” When Brazilian President Luiz Ignácio “Lula” da Silva showed him a map of Brazil, Bush exclaimed, “Wow! Brazil is big.”

There are many other examples that could be cited of presidents, industrialists and bureaucrats with limited, if non-existent, abilities.

In our society nothing is done if it isn’t profitable. In a society run by the collective producers, these problems could be solved because social need, rather than the market, would determine how decisions are made.

2007-02-23 13:42:45 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-23 13:40:09 · 18 answers · asked by mario b 2

why does the President have to be born an American citizen?

2007-02-23 13:23:22 · 23 answers · asked by kelleygaither2000 1

I feel that this would be a safegaurd against amendments that are farmful ,or not effective.Example the 21st amendment had to be made in order to repeal the 18th amendment.I would personaly like to see the 16th amendment repealed.

2007-02-23 13:21:09 · 7 answers · asked by shawnn 4

They are obviously getting rich off this war, Putting are troops in harms way for no end result, and lying to the nation to get rich from rebuilding Iraq and its oil fields (Halburton).I just read a report on Yahoo news about troops saying this war isnt worth the effort and it should end. This was 15 year Veteran Sargeant that said this.

2007-02-23 13:07:26 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

president? vicepresident? president pro tempore of the senate? senate majority leader? senate majority leader? speaker of the house? house majority leader? house mahouruty leader? chief justice of the supreme court? associate justives of the supreme court? associate justices of the supreme court? United nations ambassador? The cabinet: arrotney general? secretary of state? secetary of the treasury? secretary of defense? secretary of the interior? secretary of agruculturure? secretary of commmerce? secretary of labor? secretary of health and human services? secretary of housing and urban devellment? secretary of transportation? secretary of education? secretary ofenergy? secreatry of veteran;s affairs? secretary of homelan security? US senators of illinois? Us house of represantatives(illinois representatives)? Illinois govertment: Governor? liutenant governor? atorney general? secretry of state? comptroller?

2007-02-23 13:03:57 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous