2007-02-23 16:27:56 · 19 answers · asked by sunflare63 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Only time will tell and I pray that history will show that he is. That would be good for America. Right?
2007-02-23 18:14:09 · answer #1 · answered by Rick K 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
George Bush is not the best President this Nation has ever had. He is no more conservative than Bill Clinton. Under his leadershiplessness we are now joined with Mexico and Canada in the North American Union.
2007-02-23 18:04:59 · answer #2 · answered by SickandTired 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The jury will be out on that question for a long time, I'm afraid. While his Presidency has been quite successful, many of Mr Bush's policies have yet to be verified as correct.
2007-02-23 16:34:46 · answer #3 · answered by CJohn317 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He isn't! Never was and never will be! Historians are already weighing in on Mr. Bush and their assessment in general is not good! Can you say 'bottom of the heap?' Well many of them already have. And they are the ones who write the history books.
Looks like no bust on Mt. Rushmore for Dubya. But he could never hold a candle to the men already honored there anyway.
2007-02-23 20:27:34 · answer #4 · answered by MathBioMajor 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because he makes decisions based on what he believes to be in our best interests, not on which way the political wind is blowing at any given time. But I'm not so sure about the "best" part. Right after 9/11 I might have agreed with you but since then he has not been conservative enough for me. I want something done about our borders!
2007-02-23 16:31:59 · answer #5 · answered by Cinner 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
In response to cyclops.
If you call fabricating "proof" of serious threats in order to justify going to war with a leader of a country because that leader managed to outwit your father and you have such a serious inferiority complex that you are willing to manipulate an entire nation to do your bidding, sacrifice countless lives (including American soldiers as well as innocent Iraqis and soldiers from other countries), spend 100s of billions of dollars (which ought to be going to education, infrastructure, paying down the national debt, stopping the genocide in Darfur, ending homelessness and hunger, health care for all, and countless other initiatives), and trample all over the Constitution of the United States of America, all while allowing the Taliban (who, may I remind you was responsible for the 9/11 attacks) to regain power in Afghanistan and Iran to develop REAL WMDS (weapons of mass destruction, for those or you have been under a rock for the past six and a half years or so) and stretch our military resources so thin that we can do nothing about it, ALL IN ORDER TO PROVE YOURSELF WORTHY OF DADDY'S LOVE' the right thing, then you are as much or a threat to our national security than the man himself. Even he has finally admitted that he may have possibly not been entirely correct in his actions after 9/11, although I seriously doubt he sincerity of that admission.
2007-02-23 17:07:23 · answer #6 · answered by VistaMoon 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I disagree with that I do not think that he is the best president that this nation has ever had at all we can do better with some one else as president of course this is my own opinion.
2007-02-23 16:32:37 · answer #7 · answered by dawn_myhamsters 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
He had the backbone to do the right thing after 9/11 even,
if it meant the Liberal Democrats, would demonize him.
It Takes a Great Leader to do what is right, instead of
what is popular.
2007-02-23 16:34:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
That is by far the toughest question anybody has ever asked here. I'm sorry, but I don't have an answer, and can't find an answer anywhere. That's like asking... Why does Mars have more water than Earth?
2007-02-23 16:31:01 · answer #9 · answered by metagg 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
You're right. Washington, Lincoln, Roosevelt, Truman were all miserable failures.
2007-02-24 00:38:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋