Politics & Government - 3 September 2007

Does it feel good when you can hush the ignorant with simple and blindingly intelligent answers?

I realize it's only temporary...but doesn't it feel good to scratch that annoying?

2007-09-03 10:46:31 · 10 answers · asked by Glen B 6 in Politics

noticed lot of friends just talk and support fighting Terrorism, without knowing what it means , nobody till now put a perfect definition to explain what is terrorism,including world leaders politicians !!
so can any one explain it ton the world ? WHAT IS THE TERRORISM ???!!!SO WE CAN FIND WHOS THE TERRORISTS

2007-09-03 10:46:01 · 4 answers · asked by white angel 007 2 in Civic Participation

im looking for some to talk about with highschool students. facts about the person and what their stance is on different situations.

2007-09-03 10:43:04 · 1 answers · asked by Erin M 2 in Other - Politics & Government

FOR CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS! Clinton sold us out more times than I can count on National Security issues.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9dba9ba2-5a3b-11dc-9bcd-0000779fd2ac.html

2007-09-03 10:43:02 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-09-03 10:41:07 · 12 answers · asked by peat 1 in Politics

They demand gun control. They demand that government tell us to wear a seat belt. They demand that trans fats be banned. They demand smoking be banned. They demand restriction of information such as books that can be owned.

Then they complain that their rights are violated under the patriot act. Well if you are in contact with a suspected terrorist then you may be listened too otherwise you are a waste of time.

2007-09-03 10:35:28 · 12 answers · asked by Locutus1of1 5 in Politics

face it the government is never going to listen to what you have to say about illegal immigrants, they will never be deported and they will always keep coming here, mark my words in 20 years nothing will have changed.

2007-09-03 10:31:22 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

2007-09-03 10:31:12 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

I posted an earlier question asking how come the physics of the crash were not correct and some person had the gaul to say it looked fine. If you have an aircraft grade aluminum plane with steel, plastic, and other various parts in it ( considering the engines, frame, chairs, etc ) All traveling at a high velocity would not make a building want to collapse unto itself like that so it looks like a controlled demolishion. Let alone you would be able to find the serial numbers, parts of the plane, BLACK BOX, etc if it did have enough momentum if it could have possible hit the support beam on the building and damage it. Judging by the video it doesnt look like it. Plus steel needs to get very hot in order to melt or even bend. One plane is not going to weaken a whole building. It could put a hole in it or do damage to the top but not demolish the whole thing. The heat is going to disperse too quickly. As well the temperature of any loose burning fuel is too low to affect the steel.

2007-09-03 10:25:44 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

The popular theory is that there were two world wars in the 20th century. World War 1, with Germany and the Austro-Hungarian Empire against England, France, Japan, Russia and the US; and World War 2, with Germany, Italy and Japan against England, France, the Soviet Union and the US. Isn't it more accurate to say there was really one world war, with Germany and her allies against France, England and their allies?

There were 20 years between the end of "WW1" and the beginning of "WW2", but the German need for living space and resources was a dominant theme of both wars. Germany was not actually defeated in 1919, they merely signed an armistice. The unconditional surrender requirement, and the actual conquest of Germany and Berlin by Churchill, Stalin and Roosevelt finally ended the latest 30 years' war (1914-1945).

Do you agree?

2007-09-03 10:24:55 · 12 answers · asked by A Plague on your houses 5 in Military

Car accident my air bag didn't deploy. Brand new car (corolla s 2007)157miles on it. Some guy cut me off i tried to change lane lost control and crashed into the side. i was told i hit a telephone poll and maybe a sign. I don't know if i hit it straight on or not. I was also told my car had flipped, don't recall whether he said couple time or once.There is a big dent to the driver side cut into the motor where the wheel is (poll probably). The whole front is demolished and the car is totaled. I don't think you would be able to tell if it was a head on or side hit from looking at the car..thats how bad the front is. I was going 80-90mph or maybe less i don't recall exactly. The police officer was even surprise the airbag didn't go off when we talked in the hospital. i suffered a concussion, a bone fracture in the face, and minor cuts bruises. Do i have a case here?(against dealership)
I am very lucky to be alive.

2007-09-03 10:23:13 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2007-09-03 10:22:34 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

She came here for middle and high school. She is in her mid 20's now. Unfortunately, she in bad shape because of the parents. But how can she be legalized? able to work? go to school? what rights does she have. Im clue less. Who can i speak to.?

*please no insults. I prefer answers from mature compassionate people.
Thanks

2007-09-03 10:21:12 · 9 answers · asked by Josue M 1 in Immigration

I pride much if so. This great news and hopeful they follow in footstep of benevolent Arafat and bring world era of palestinian peace.

2007-09-03 10:20:46 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Hypothetical situation: if you had to live in a Nazi-style fascist regime, or a USSR-style Communist regime, which one would you choose, and why? Which one do you think would be the first to eventually reform itself and embrace freedom and capitalism?

2007-09-03 10:14:57 · 8 answers · asked by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 in Politics

Which party is more effective?

Arguments?

2007-09-03 10:13:18 · 11 answers · asked by Glen B 6 in Politics

2007-09-03 10:11:00 · 16 answers · asked by Greenman 2 in Law Enforcement & Police

The Founding Fathers guarenteed us "Freedom of religion", not "Freedom from religion."

America was founded on Judeo- Christian values.

Prayer and attending religous services have both been a part of our cultural experience since the arrival of the Mayflower.

Religous expression is part of the American identity.

Why should the National Day of Pray be controversial? If you don't want to pray, you don't have to?

Isn't that the same logic the libs use regarding t.v. violence? If you don't want to watch it, then don't.

(Details above from the book, "The Savage Nation".)

Aren't you just so sick and tired of how the liberal secularists are trying to secularize America?

I'm not going to bend over to some foolish atheist. TOO BAD IF THEY DON'T BELIEVE! I DON'T CARE.
America was founded for the freedom of worship to the Judeo- Christian God.
We can't forget that.
And we can't let these secular progressives make us forget and abandon our religious roots since the bi

2007-09-03 10:10:48 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-09-03 10:10:43 · 7 answers · asked by Kelly B 4 in Politics

most people who refuse to look at the facts are the ones who claim 9/11 conspiracy theorists are wackos or crazy. these people are so ignorant. and they choose to be. why? do they think if they just stick their heads in the sand it will all be ok and just disappear. these are the people that are destroying america, not bush.

reply to my questions bush cowards... http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AiGtwojf8th19umjE_hcAcvty6IX?qid=20070903115624AAxv7K7

2007-09-03 10:09:45 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

i found out that it can be true on a website of laws

2007-09-03 10:05:09 · 4 answers · asked by Dont kill animals!Be a veagan!!! 2 in Law & Ethics

how can they claim to support America while praising walmart, and destroy the manufacturing jobs in the US and allow companies to hire illegals?

2007-09-03 10:03:58 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

We hate each other. Soon enough that hatred is going to explode. I'd like half of America to be Liberal and the other Conservative. I'm Independent myself.

Not gonna happen I know but still I like to dream big.

2007-09-03 10:02:26 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Certainly there are critics and proponents from both sides, but doesn't it seem more like a catch 22? Obviously one side will not be appeased with the decision to either stay or go.

While I would assume most Americans want the troops brought home, and I certainly do, there are too many adverse effects that would equate to an unstable government.
Then pro-war activists will claim it's a success. I agree to an extent that it is, but longterm occupation obviously is not going to work either.

How do YOU choose whether to stay or go?

2007-09-03 09:59:42 · 11 answers · asked by Glen B 6 in Politics

Look I don't want to say that all antis are facists and racists because I know that is unfair and untrue. But it seems to me that many of the things what you say about today's illegals in the US can be said right back at you by NDNs. How do you consider that?

2007-09-03 09:58:17 · 17 answers · asked by ♥ ~Sigy the Arctic Kitty~♥ 7 in Immigration

2007-09-03 09:56:40 · 15 answers · asked by eldude 5 in Immigration

And as a follow up question, Should we liberate Iran next?

2007-09-03 09:51:48 · 15 answers · asked by PNAC ~ Penelope 4 in Politics

Isn't it obvious to you by this point that Iraq is headed for a civil war?
We invaded without UN authorization - bad idea.
We disbanded the Iraqi army - bad idea.
We put Shia death squads in charge of the police and army - bad idea
Then we gave the Sunnis weapons to fight "al Qaeda in Iraq" - bad idea.

And now we are supposed to believe that "the surge" worked and that's why the British are leaving and we can leave too?

Whatever. Most people are not that stupid.

2007-09-03 09:49:14 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

The resolution—sponsored by Republican Reps. Virgil Goode Jr. of Virginia, Tom Tancredo of Colorado, Walter Jones of North Carolina, and Ron Paul of Texas—expresses "the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union (NAU) with Mexico or Canada."

http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/cover121406.htm

For the full story click the link provided.

Question....Are the Mexican trucks due to be on the roads this week a sure sign the NAU and the Amero currency will be instituted against the citizens wishes?

2007-09-03 09:45:49 · 10 answers · asked by Dog Tricks 4 in Immigration

if we accepted responsibility for our decisions, perhaps we'd put a little effort into who gets our votes....i feel good i didn't vote for that idiot.

2007-09-03 09:43:42 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections