How come the 9/11 looks like a controlled demolishion?

Question

I posted an earlier question asking how come the physics of the crash were not correct and some person had the gaul to say it looked fine. If you have an aircraft grade aluminum plane with steel, plastic, and other various parts in it ( considering the engines, frame, chairs, etc ) All traveling at a high velocity would not make a building want to collapse unto itself like that so it looks like a controlled demolishion. Let alone you would be able to find the serial numbers, parts of the plane, BLACK BOX, etc if it did have enough momentum if it could have possible hit the support beam on the building and damage it. Judging by the video it doesnt look like it. Plus steel needs to get very hot in order to melt or even bend. One plane is not going to weaken a whole building. It could put a hole in it or do damage to the top but not demolish the whole thing. The heat is going to disperse too quickly. As well the temperature of any loose burning fuel is too low to affect the steel.

You have to keep in mind that any loose fuel may burn hot. The metal might even burn red or turn cherry hot. However after the fuel is done burning the heat would dissipate. Most likely even leave metal bent out of shape if it gets hot enough but it would not cause the building to collapse like that. That almost looks like shape charges were used due to parts of it blowing outward when it was falling. Not even a fire should have done that.

There has never been a crash where a part of the plane albeit the black box didn't survive the wreckage. To my, my families, and all the pilots, (we personally know)'s knowledge. Even into a friggin building. Or when plummeting into the depths of the ocean.

Answer 1

Because it was a controlled demolition. Anyone with any common sense can see with their own two eyes that the buildings exploded. Obviously the gov't has used this to their advantage in advancing the foreign policies of what Eisenhower called the military industrial complex and oppressing the American people with the PATRIOT Act. Put two and two together. I can't believe people are so stupid

Answer 2

As you can see the plan has worked well - 7 years after the fact people are still argueing over the idea that the towers fell

On one CNN video you can clearly see the nose of the plane going through the buidling as you would a hologram passing through the structure .

Marvin Bush - brother to the President was in command of security that day -

Stock trades made just prior suggest inside knowledge

There was little to no dammage to other building right next door to the trade towers

It took over 80 minutes to scramble one friggin jet to the situation when the week before the same crew(s) took out over 22 simulated threats to US air space in less than 10 minutes

The "leader" of the group left enough footprints of his actions as to be found by a blind man Credit cards manuels etc - This was a man who wanted to leave a trail and took a jet from Boston - miles away from the most logical point -

The 19 men armed with box cutters ? Most were found alive and well in Pakistan

In the ruble of burnt steel - where it was so hot as to take down a steel mega building - they found a partially cinged passport -


We were all told Oshama Bin Laden (who is still at large)

Then somehow our attention was shifted to Saddam who was found in a hole in the ground - by the same US command and inteilgence community that has failed to find Bin Laden

Now our attention is being once more shifted to Iran -

But with all of that ----


We are still argueing over the plausibility of the 9/11 attacks a full 7 years later -

Did it didn't it - Could this could that have happened etc

Even if you do stick to what is "offically known" you come out with the fact that the government has never gotten to the bottom of any of this - Let alone adequetely explained it to the taxpayer

Answer 3

The Fire resistant coating was blown of the main support beams on impact , keep in mind missiles are also lightweight ,but pack a wallop.,Thanks to Environmentalist , just like the changes in the formula on the shuttles, the newer formulas won't adhere as well.I Don't think any one really ever thought a missile with humans onboard was ever going to hit it.Jet Fuel is certainly burns hot enough to do the trick. In fact it served as great Kindling to start other things in the building to ignite,Airplane seats and parts,andBlack Boxes are designed to stand up to about anything,as for passports I think that was just luck,alot of other personal items however were also recovered.To answer your ? about the way it went down They call that Gravity,when those main supports go everything will pancake.When a controlled Demo takes place the explosions are designed to take out specific structural points to cause it to collapse inward.The terrorist got lucky 2 times. The conspiracy theorist are lucky too. They can sell books to all the other people clutching at straws trying to find a reason that we went to war in the Middle East.When there are alot more different , Tangible, well thought out conspiracy's that our government has been acting out for many,many years.

Answer 4

When the planes crashed into the buildings they had almost full tanks of fuel.. That is a lot of fuel and it spilled into the towers causing the fires to be continuous which heated up the steel and eventually melted some of it,thus weakening the whole structure causing a domino like effect and the buildings came crashing down...

Answer 5

The only thing we really know for sure of this incident is there have been more questions than satisfactory answers generated.

Perhaps no other single incident in recent history has been accorded so much spin-doctoring. So very many early explanations of the buildings collapse behaviour have since been questioned or discredited by credible non-conspiracist authorities.

One suspects that the architectural answers, among others, will not be accurately revealed until the incident becomes less iconic or politicised.

Answer 6

I think the thing that most people miss is that the World Trade Center buildings were not of typical construction techniques.

The World Trade Center included many structural engineering innovations in skyscraper design and construction. The towers were designed as framed tube structures. There was a frame of closely-spaced columns tied together by deep spandrel beams along the exterior perimeter. The interior had 47 columns, all concentrated in the core. Engineer Felix Samuely used a similar concept in his "Mullion wall" buildings in the early 1950s as did Eero Saarinen in his US Embassy, London (1955-60); but these projects were low to medium rise and may not have been influences.

The perimeter columns supported virtually all lateral loads, such as wind loads, and shared the gravity loads with the core columns.[6] All columns were founded on bedrock, which unlike Midtown Manhattan, where the bedrock is shallow, is at 65 feet (20m) below the surface. Above the seventh floor there were 59 perimeter columns along each face of the building. The perimeter columns had a square cross section, 14 inches on a side (36 cm), and were constructed of welded steel plate.[6] The thickness of the plates and grade of steel were varied over the height of the tower, ranging from 36 ksi to 100 ksi, with the steel strength and plate thickness decreasing with height.[6] The perimeter structure was constructed with extensive use of prefabricated modular pieces, which consisted of three columns, three stories tall, connected together by spandrel plates. The spandrel plates were welded to the columns at the fabrication shop. The modular pieces were typically 52 inches (1.3 m) deep, and extended for two full floors and half of two more floors.[6]

The center of the building carried most structural load and the planes fuel burning would be able to weaken the structure enough so that they could not support the load above. Once the upper floors started falling it increased the load on the lower floors through shock load causing the rest of the structure to collapse.

Had the WTC been of traditional construction it is possible that they would have survived the impact and burning of the planes as the Empire State Building did in the 1940's.

The impact of the plane did not cause the builds to fall it was the fire form the thousands of gallons of aviation fuel burning that weakened the buildings causing them to fall.

The combination of unique construction and application of intense heat at the core of the buildings caused the failure

Get over it. People who hate the USA wanted to hurt us and kill people did this, not a great conspiracy by President Bush. In fact if he is a dumb as liberals and conspiracy theorists want us to believe who could he have do it?

Answer 7

The pressure from falling rubble onto floors below would cause pressure irregularities that would cause smoke and debris to blast out of inherent weak points of the structure. Fatigue from the different swaying motions of the separated structures caused the building the ultimately collapse. That is what I believe happened.

Answer 8

because it is. look, i can't get anybody who believes 9/11 was done solely by arabs to even comment on the FACTS i present, just labeled a nutjob. i love the fact that i am more open minded, less gullible and flat out smarter than these idiots. check my question and tell me what you think about it. i love shutting these dumb @$$e$ up. LOVE IT!! the great thing is, if they see the facts and make no comment, guess what that means. they are thinking about it now, possibly for the first time ever.

there is a first time for all of us. none of us want to believe what we have come to realize. when americans finally have that epiphany, it changes everything for them. its like they were in the matrix and have awaken. now they must choose, the red pill or the blue.

over 3 hours, not one bush supporter can refute any of my facts i produce. they always ask for them. here they are.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AiGtwojf8th19umjE_hcAcvty6IX?qid=20070903115624AAxv7K7

and by the way, popular mechanics had to change the entire editorial staff there because the old chief editor refused to go along with the game. find out the truth. i love exposing it.

Answer 9

If you haven't yet, look up the video "loose change" online and watch it. This link should take you to the video. http://www.loosechange911.com/index_main.html
It's a full documentary that talks about what really happened that day. It demonstrates buildings that were brought down with controled demolition and then they show the WTC coming down in slow motion, highlighting light flashes that occured in the building 3 and 4 floors below the demolition wave. If this video doesn't stop and make you think twice, I'm not sure what will.
I hope this helps.

Answer 10

Exactly how hot do you think jet fuel burning in a building full of offices burns?