It's an interesting quirk in the law that nobody ever talks about. Women claim that they should have the right to get an abortion whenever they want, without the man having any rights, yet the man is supposed to have all the responsibilities of the woman once the kid is born? Wouldn't it make more sense to allow both the man and the woman to be able to force an abortion since its half his, or at the very least the woman sign a waiver if she keeps the baby. (I actually consider abortion to be wrong under all but the most extreme situations, but as women so elegently put it (grow ovaries then talk) How do you justify making a man take care of a baby he doesn't even have the right to protect from murder?
2007-08-20
14:50:27
·
38 answers
·
asked by
scorch_22
6
in
Government