2007-07-18 23:57:56 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics
might should not be right in democratic system. persons,who have accumulated more wealth & power by now should share it with hard working,innocent group of society.
2007-07-18 23:57:02 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous in Civic Participation
2007-07-18 23:54:48 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration
The last I heard he was in Germany
2007-07-18 23:40:59 · 5 answers · asked by Kay Cee 1 in Military
and what was it for?
i got arressted for carrying a knife ( well it was a stanley knife and i forgot i had it in my pocket from work as im a builder )
2007-07-18 23:26:52 · 39 answers · asked by old school 2 in Law Enforcement & Police
2007-07-18 23:25:46 · 6 answers · asked by Ray 2 in Politics
Names of the countries that allows tourist visa on arrival at the respective airport.
2007-07-18 23:25:30 · 12 answers · asked by T.V. J 1 in Embassies & Consulates
please give me some websites
2007-07-18 23:15:10 · 5 answers · asked by Qwertyuiop 1 in Law Enforcement & Police
what is the best way to deal with a rolling road block?
2007-07-18 23:11:23 · 4 answers · asked by Always Curious 7 in Law Enforcement & Police
when we are able to check out free cd's at our libraries, are they disobeying the copyright laws? Because unless we don't have a computer nearly everybody rips them despite the cover on the cases.
2007-07-18 23:06:47 · 3 answers · asked by dustdevil_333 2 in Law & Ethics
2007-07-18 22:57:04 · 24 answers · asked by Victor E 2 in Law & Ethics
?
2007-07-18 22:52:17 · 25 answers · asked by TMFULP. 3 in Politics
as an Englishman who is currently on business in the USA i feel i must ask this.
As M.D and travelling executive of HuGe LoNg BeLtS Ltd i have nothing but praise for the USA, my business is thriving and due to the USA profits i may now retire.
Thanks Yanks
2007-07-18 22:52:17 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics
2007-07-18 22:44:38 · 34 answers · asked by 9thGate 1 in Politics
Put yourself in an immigrants shoes.You and your family are starving,living in a shack,and are desperate.You have no money or food and have no other options in the world,but right next door is the great USA!You would like to become a citizen the right way but their is one problem..........YOU HAVE NO MONEY!Would you risk your life for your wife and kids for the chance to have a better life?Be honest people! I bet some of you guys are going to crack me up!
2007-07-18 22:35:40 · 14 answers · asked by ill vato! 1 in Immigration
to solve the Iraq war or to solve the immigration problems?
2007-07-18 22:29:31 · 17 answers · asked by lizziemoffles 4 in Politics
when they make your lives easier in the end. i can't stand all the hatred thats around just because people come here for better lives. what i don't get is why everyone is so persistent about getting the "mexicans" out of america when no one is trying to send illegal canadians back to their native country either.
i just hate the hypocrisy.
2007-07-18 22:27:21 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration
I know a lot of people don't like our president, but he isn't the first one people didn't like. Does everyone have to insult him and completely debase his character. The U.S. is still in decent shape, and do you think he intentionally tried to screw us over? I have no problem with people who disagree with him and think he did a bad job, but I do have a problem with people who attack him and say that he's a terrible person because I refuse to believe that's true. He has served our country in the way he thought was best. And don't forget we elected him.
2007-07-18 22:22:59 · 10 answers · asked by billybutsky 4 in Politics
worried?
2007-07-18 22:22:15 · 2 answers · asked by 2012 4 in Politics
2007-07-18 22:17:18 · 8 answers · asked by Nur Afra_Nur Afza J 1 in Politics
Why are men historially the soldiers and the warriors?
other then physical strength.
Also in moden days who would be the better combat soldiers men or women? why?
2007-07-18 22:10:41 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military
In reviewing the history of Taiwan beginning in the mid-1940's, many researchers are now claiming that the Japanese surrender ceremonies on Oct. 25, 1945, only marked the beginning of the military occupation of the areas of "Formosa and the Pescadores."
In other words, there was no "Taiwan Retrocession Day." Indeed, none of the Allied countries recognized any transfer of the sovereignty of "Formosa and the Pescadores" to China in 1945.
With this analysis firmly in mind, it would then appear that when the ROC moved its central government to occupied Taiwan in mid-Dec. 1949, it became a government in exile.
Furthermore, international law specifies that there are no actions which a government in exile can take to be recognized as the legal government of its current locality of residence.
This would explain why, despite all the democratic advances made by the ROC in Taiwan in the past two decades, it is still shunned by the international community.
Opinions anyone?
2007-07-18 22:02:49 · 5 answers · asked by Overseas E 3 in Government
A few years have passed now since the war on terror began, however does anyone else, like me, feel uneasy about the way in which prisoners still being detained without trial. British law (arguably a template that other countries have adopted) has always been based on "Innocent till proven guilty". The people in Guantanamo Bay have never been afforded this luxury though and it leaves a bad taste in the mouth about how the world is moving foward. If they are guilty of murderous crimes I say throw away the key and switch the lights off on the way out, but I think this should have been proven far quicker in order to quell the suffering of innocent parties and their families.
Your sensible thoughts please?
2007-07-18 22:01:28 · 14 answers · asked by ? 3 in Law & Ethics
taking into consideration what he has said the last 6 years about anything and what eventually transpired...why should I believe him now if he tells me anything?
In fact, is it not logical to assume that whatever Bush says or advocates at this time that we should do the complete opposite?
2007-07-18 21:54:43 · 18 answers · asked by me 3 in Politics
I believe that the world would be a far safer place without Nuclear weapons. However, as far as Im aware (being a Brit) the American Constitution states that people have the right to bear arms in order to defend themselves. With this in mind if the USA, Russia, UK, France and a few others are allowed to stock a nuclear arsenal, why do America and her allies feel the need to chastise Iran. Don't get me wrong I don't want the Iranians to have the capability either, but surely they have a right to defend themselves like everyone else. If not then America should be hassling the UK and France too.
Your sensible thoughts please?
2007-07-18 21:53:49 · 13 answers · asked by ? 3 in Politics
2007-07-18 21:53:48 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics
1 more year, 2 more years, 5 more years, 10 years, 20 years, 50 years?
How much money are we willing to spend there?
2 trillion dollars, 5 trillion dollars, 20 trillion dollars???
how many american soldiers are we willing to sacrifice for the cause there? 5,000? 10,000? 40,000? 200,0000?
2007-07-18 21:48:57 · 8 answers · asked by me 3 in Politics
I know of a number crimes that haven't been reported, because people don't trust the police to do anything. I actually reported something myself and the police put the phone down.
2007-07-18 21:46:15 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police
What's the deal with everyone using this term to describe Democrats and slightly Left-leaning people?
It's moronic. If Republicans aren't Liberal, does that mean they're opposed to individual liberty, freedom of thought and the other values of a democratic nation?
Once again, the term "Liberal" is being used as an adjective, and incorrectly at that. It is not - I repeat - not the name of a party. Think of a better term... gosh, maybe even "Left-Wing"?
2007-07-18 21:44:30 · 8 answers · asked by Gotta have more explosions! 7 in Politics
If stopped at a sobriety checkpoint and asked, "Have you had anything to drink tonight?" and I answer, "yes" even though I have not consumed any alcohol....as I drink water, iced tea and soda. I've told the truth; and usually when the officer asks, they don't specify alcohol. It may be implied, but if they aren't specific...if I say, "no" I'm guilty of lying to the officer, and if I say "yes" I could be guilty of interfering with the officer doing their job (wasting their time). There's just no winning this one...for me.
2007-07-18 21:32:58 · 12 answers · asked by Always Curious 7 in Law Enforcement & Police
Questions asked on 18 July 2007:
Showing 1 to 30 of 898 questions
Questions asked on other days: