Politics & Government - 15 May 2007

2007-05-15 10:07:59 · 3 answers · asked by purplehelmet696969 2 in Military

A "parent" at my sons (7) boy scout meeting called my son a "shithead." What are the legalalities of this?

2007-05-15 10:00:45 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

f***king close to water

2007-05-15 09:56:29 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

Isn't that just a wee bit childish? If you can't rip someone without resporting to name-calling, are you really showing how unintelligent you are?

Just a thought.

2007-05-15 09:56:20 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

http://web.archive.org/web/20060516040328/www.homelandsecurity.alabama.gov/tap/dom_terr.htm

It appears that "domestic terrorists" speak out against the government, according to this government website.

2007-05-15 09:56:18 · 11 answers · asked by sarcasm_generator 2 in Civic Participation

2007-05-15 09:55:18 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

and let them slaughter one another.........? theyve been fighting for centuries. US troops cannot delay the inevitable

how is that when US troops leave, somehow these two warring factions will kiss and make up, and join forces to attack US soil?

lmao,.....who's buying that line of crap?

2007-05-15 09:54:53 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

It has been the long standing policy of this Great United States Of America that we DO NOT negotiate with terrorists.

So, someone please give me a valid reason why we let the loons in N. Korea threaten the world with nukes for a couple years… but now that they say basically “Well, now that you have agreed to show us the money, we will step down on our Nuke policy… Hell, we will even let the UN in to check it out! We love you so very much now, USA!”

Anyway… why has our government for the last 40 plus years paid these rouge states to shut them up? Why do we keep funding governments that just use this money to stock arms to threaten us and the world… while they people starve and receive disinformation?

This is a bi-partisan issue and is a fact that I can not understand.

2007-05-15 09:54:48 · 8 answers · asked by Dog Lover 7 in Politics

The Neocon fascists keep utilizing force externally, while not so gently coercing the US population, to further thier agenda.

The DNC Socialists Utilize force against the US citizen, while not so gently coercing foreign interests

Don't you people see that although the rhetoric differs, the end result is the same?! Why do you continue to support these totalitarian whores in New Rome?

2007-05-15 09:52:59 · 2 answers · asked by guyin559 2 in Politics

I am from venezuela and i need to emigrate to us right now cause evrybody knows the political moment in this country. which organitations can help me to get this goal, i am professional with university degree in information technologies and 20 years experience.

2007-05-15 09:50:21 · 4 answers · asked by Axel R 1 in International Organizations

2007-05-15 09:48:06 · 17 answers · asked by Majejida 2 in Immigration

2007-05-15 09:45:50 · 9 answers · asked by the man 1 in Military

brand new 2nd lt in the Marine Corps

2007-05-15 09:44:51 · 8 answers · asked by daarka 1 in Military

2007-05-15 09:43:37 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

2007-05-15 09:40:18 · 11 answers · asked by ? 1 in Law & Ethics

The US Government forced immigrants from Europe ( Russia, Italy, Poland, Latvia, Greece,etc.) to legally register to enter the country at Ellis Island. The US took such draconian measures such as checking for diseases and any criminal activity in the country from which they came. Many were deported as a result. Is this an indicator that the US was prejudiced and racist against Europeans such as it is claimed the present US policy is racist.

2007-05-15 09:37:23 · 4 answers · asked by illinipower 2 in Immigration

2007-05-15 09:33:43 · 7 answers · asked by hosemonk@sbcglobal.net 2 in Elections

In the U.K. they can retire on full pension as early as 48. Why is this when everyone else (excepy public servants) has to work until they are 65.There would be a shortage of plumbers mates if they retired at that age

2007-05-15 09:33:03 · 10 answers · asked by Sparks 2 in Law Enforcement & Police

do you think the brittish army should be Iraq

2007-05-15 09:31:56 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

1. impeach him, and
2. bring Clinton's prosperity back?

2007-05-15 09:30:58 · 15 answers · asked by anonymous 1 in Politics

I'm so sick and tired of this scam we call big oil. Why as Americans cant we get together and extingwish this scurge.
Arent you sick of greed dictating the quality of our lives? Im so sick of them stating there problems of why the price goes up then recording record profits every quarter. What BS!!! they have become as bad as insurance companies and hospitals and polititions. All big business crooks or scam artistist. I dont even care who I talk with I just need to vent!!!

2007-05-15 09:30:01 · 11 answers · asked by toolman 2 in Law & Ethics

2007-05-15 09:29:38 · 16 answers · asked by hstewart002 1 in Law & Ethics

I have some written work I want to protect especially the names I have invented. What do I do? I live in the UK. Is copyright binding the world over or does it differ in different countries?

2007-05-15 09:26:47 · 2 answers · asked by chrissy b 1 in Law & Ethics

Less gov't regulation of business and assume that a free and fluid marketplace will instantaneously transmit information to citizens making corporate activities transparent? 'Cuz if that's what conservatives think will happen, they are delusional. If the gov't stop monitoring environmental aspects of corporations, their would be thousands of them dumping God knows what all over the place within 24 hours. I've worked for companies that do it now when they think they can get away with it. Also, imagine what companies like Enron and Halliburton would be trying to get away with.

2007-05-15 09:26:19 · 12 answers · asked by Gemini 5 in Politics

2007-05-15 09:22:51 · 16 answers · asked by ? 7 in Military

My Idea:
American’s currently only have the right to vote for a person that various rich political groups have placed on a ballet. These candidates generally represent the ideology of the people of their political association, not necessarily mine. Over the decades it has been fairly common that the American public is forced to choose between voting for a candidate that we don’t fully agree with (The lesser of evils) or not voting and losing any say in how our government is run.

To fix the problem of voter dissatisfaction in the voting process then the voters need an honest and direct option to vote against candidates that they believe are the worst option. When I cast my vote against a candidate I want the option to directly NEGATIVELY impact a candidate’s totals, not to just support another candidate that I don’t fully believe in.

The rule is One Person = One Vote. Why can’t my vote be one of a Negative? A negative vote would allow me to honestly express my desires.

2007-05-15 09:22:19 · 5 answers · asked by Dmetri 1 in Elections

It is rightly said, A kind hearted person can't win a war.

Let's give unlimited powers to military in Iraq.

And give them one mission, win the war at any cost.
war can't be win , if follow human rights and why should be follows human right, when terrorist don't follow. Forget world opinion, and let's do it. Make a rule, no iraq news in media

2007-05-15 09:21:15 · 10 answers · asked by sumit_batra 3 in Military

what is the uss ship for texas and florida?? (example uss arizona)

2007-05-15 09:20:08 · 5 answers · asked by M.. 1 in Military

2007-05-15 09:19:34 · 10 answers · asked by andy r 3 in Politics

Is anyone interested in the subject of Iwo Jima? if you would like to talk about that i would really like that.

2007-05-15 09:18:05 · 2 answers · asked by M.. 1 in Military