My Idea:
American’s currently only have the right to vote for a person that various rich political groups have placed on a ballet. These candidates generally represent the ideology of the people of their political association, not necessarily mine. Over the decades it has been fairly common that the American public is forced to choose between voting for a candidate that we don’t fully agree with (The lesser of evils) or not voting and losing any say in how our government is run.
To fix the problem of voter dissatisfaction in the voting process then the voters need an honest and direct option to vote against candidates that they believe are the worst option. When I cast my vote against a candidate I want the option to directly NEGATIVELY impact a candidate’s totals, not to just support another candidate that I don’t fully believe in.
The rule is One Person = One Vote. Why can’t my vote be one of a Negative? A negative vote would allow me to honestly express my desires.
2007-05-15
09:22:19
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Dmetri
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections