English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics & Government - 31 March 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government

Civic Participation · Elections · Embassies & Consulates · Government · Immigration · International Organizations · Law & Ethics · Law Enforcement & Police · Military · Other - Politics & Government · Politics

2007-03-31 06:25:46 · 21 answers · asked by kobacker59 6 in Immigration

If we are in such control and making so much progress,(like the Bush Administration always tells us) then we should know when the job will be done based on Bush's superior planning.

Why can't Bush lay out a plan for what he is doing, and then go out and do it? With benchmarks and dates! Just like any other endeavor/plan/project.

Or does he simply not have a plan or a clue?

2007-03-31 06:25:45 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-03-31 06:25:09 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

I mean how you talk about zimbawe or....! anyway a crime is a crime, this people were torture for no reson ,and maybe because they are foreigners and black, but we all know it if one do wrong to innocent people, their salary are the curses written in the bible Levit 19:33,34. and this people are not musilm, there are innocent african christiens, GOD knows.

2007-03-31 06:21:14 · 3 answers · asked by Rain Maker 2 in Law & Ethics

Veternas are taking the rap for greedy politicians. IT IS VERY
OBVIOUS THAT SOMETIMES IT IS MORE PROFITABLE TO LOOK WEAK. IT THE OLD TENDENCY TO FAVOR THE ALSO RAN BECAUSE HE WAQS REALLY TRYING HARD. THE WAR IS TO BE GIVEN ACCESS TO OIL. THA='s MONEY.

2007-03-31 06:18:10 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

Hope a Constitutional Law maven is reading.

This concept has long bugged me and seems Just Wrong to me.

A corporation is considered a 'person' -- is this not nutty? And more than just nutty, is it not a cause of much of what's wrong with the country and world?

Does it not help people in charge of corporations avoid consequences for their decisions and actions?

What's the logic behind this bizarre notion?

splain me, Lucy.

2007-03-31 06:17:59 · 8 answers · asked by tehabwa 7 in Law & Ethics

2007-03-31 06:15:07 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

As a Liberal it is easy to see many flaws in the Conservative mindset. Every time a Conservative spews forth some pathetic self-righteous utterance we as Liberals react. We feel the passion against their drivel deep in our guts, but many times we fail to see the rational evidence against their position. Our thought is based on a belief that there is a definite right and wrong, and we must always do right. Righteousness is based on a belief that regardless of our state it still exists. We cannot justify doing wrong because we do not make the rules, and if we were to die tomorrow right would still be right. A defining principle of Conservativeism is moral relativism in which right and wrong are defined by an individual’s position in life. Here in lies the problem that we as Liberals face.

2007-03-31 06:13:45 · 20 answers · asked by Darth Vader 6 in Politics

Does he remind you of John Wayne, or Ronald Reagan?

2007-03-31 06:13:16 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

And if it should be, should other countries and factions regard us in the same way and behave likewise?

2007-03-31 06:11:59 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

They kept all of the security deposite and everything else was normal wear and tear. Any info on this would be appriciated. Can she do anything to my credit standing?

2007-03-31 06:10:49 · 5 answers · asked by nxsus6 2 in Law & Ethics

Great Britain...America has quite an affinity toward you. You are our greatest ally and we will always be there for you. We of course will not act without your blessing...but please know...we are there for you IF you need us. Do not let iran bully you. We have your back. ALWAYS AND FOREVER..



Long live the Queen!!!
God Bless America!!!


just wanted to send my love to our cousins from across the pond. Cheers!!!

2007-03-31 06:08:24 · 20 answers · asked by quarterback 2 in Other - Politics & Government

2007-03-31 06:08:16 · 12 answers · asked by Deeman 1 in Other - Politics & Government

A recent report from the Pentagon-said Rumsfelds base closing are hurting our current War effort-training -logistics-etc? I guess it would have been alright if the War Bush and his neo-con chickenhawks turned out as planned.

2007-03-31 06:05:35 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

yet I feel it should be taxed. I am advised 0.1p per question, so 10 questions would cost a penny. What levy do you reccommend great British public?

2007-03-31 06:02:06 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

Joe Biden a Democrat says he has no qualms-attacking a country that is trying to harm us-he wants a straong military-but does not want to go around the world setting up governments-(in other words destroy their infrastructure-let them run around with bottled water and flashlights0 but forget the scheming Bush method of War (OIL)

2007-03-31 06:02:01 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

I don't know too much about him as a politician, but as a veteran, I think he's amazing. And that's tough for me to say as my father was a medic in the Vietnam war, but he wasn't on the side doing the bombing, and even my dad has respect for me.

2007-03-31 06:00:43 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

China is Rissing Fast What Yaer do you think China will be the worlds Next Super Power. 2012, 2015, 2020, or 2025

2007-03-31 05:58:15 · 9 answers · asked by Bob 2 in Politics

Why has his rejection been so complete?

2007-03-31 05:57:09 · 9 answers · asked by Its me 4 in Politics

As a conservative it is easy to see many flaws in the liberal mindset. Every time a liberal spews forth some pathetic self-righteous utterance we as conservatives react. We feel the passion against their drivel deep in our guts, but many times we fail to see the rational evidence against their position. Our thought is based on a belief that there is a definite right and wrong, and we must always do right. Righteousness is based on a belief that regardless of our state it still exists. We cannot justify doing wrong because we do not make the rules, and if we were to die tomorrow right would still be right. A defining principle of liberalism is moral relativism in which right and wrong are defined by an individual’s position in life. Here in lies the problem that we as conservatives face. We cannot fight their position on any intellectual level because we are not even playing the same game. Trying to judge their position by our moral principles is comparing apples to oranges. Take heart because we do not have to display their errors, their own philosophy does a better job of that than we ever could.

Their main flaw lies in their inane definitions of self. They profess not to believe in an all encompassing right and wrong, but in a belief that it is each individual who defines their own personal right. They throw the idea of a moral law, and a creator out the proverbial window. Fear not because they continually contradict this defining principle of their own doctrine. They rationalize all of their actions based on moral relativism, but judge the conservative position based on our rules. They will not define an abortion as wrong because they say it may have been right for that individual at that time while in the same breath they cannot emphasize enough how wrong the conservative position is. How is it possible to define our position as wrong, but justify their own immoral acts? They cannot without contradicting themselves. In light of this it becomes clear that they do not really believe in moral relativism, rather there is some other motivation to their thought. I contend that despite their vast efforts to seem righteous, it is evil that navigates their ship. They deny moral law because it is easy to cheat steal and lie.

We as humans have this little problem called original sin, and unless we submit to the fact that we must avoid wrong we will do wrong. All the budding liberal has to do is deny the fact that they are bound to moral law, and bingo life is great. They can now proceed to whittle away what conscience they ever had by repeatedly doing the wrong thing and justifying it through a liberal doctrine. You and I as conservatives give ourselves over to moral law and are fulfilled by true righteousness. The liberal in turn floats from scandal to scandal all the while justifying their acts, but never finding the peace that comes from truly being right. Their attempt to break free from the moral law confines them in a prison of immorality much like a bank robber. In his attempt to flee the law he increases the time he spends in prison. The liberal is the bank robber of the philosophical world. They believe that robbing another will provide them with wealth, but all they accomplish is their own self-demise. I pity the liberal for their blindness, but I am weary of them because bank robbers will shoot back when the law catches up with them. We as conservatives must hone our intellect, and be prepared to put the liberal down when he tries to shoot his way out of the corner he put himself in.

2007-03-31 05:53:20 · 19 answers · asked by ? 3 in Politics

2007-03-31 05:52:38 · 3 answers · asked by chickeedee 2 in Law Enforcement & Police

Some clowns keep calling me Raymond! Who Is he?????

2007-03-31 05:48:45 · 6 answers · asked by mark k 3 in Politics

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/0328roberts0328.html

This is ridiculous, two krauts who were smart enough to set up scam after scam are all of a sudden unable to be executed because they are "retarded". Fry these krauts.

2007-03-31 05:45:16 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

My husband was accused of stealing a an item by an employee from Wal-mart. He did NOT steal anything. The item in question is supposedly a Music CD. (this music cd isn't even music he listens too) I don't appreciate this.

It's not about the item or price..it's about the principle.

What would be the best way to settle this matter..as now everytime i go into wal-mart i want to have a few words with this women? what options do i have?

2007-03-31 05:45:15 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

do i have to answer the questions and turn it in or can i just forget about it..........

2007-03-31 05:43:48 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

fedest.com, questions and answers