I mean, they knew when they started taking the drug that its truly long-term effects hadn't been documented. For that matter, if for some reason you're able to justify suing anyone, why not the FDA? The pharmaceutical company sent a chemical off with the intention of finding out if the watchdogs for this sort of thing thought it was safe enough to prescribe. Who can blame them for selling it when it comes back with the greenlight? There aren't honestly people out there thinking we tested... Oh, I don't know... Prozac since 1920 are there? That's what it would take to prove that prolonged contact doesn't accelerate brainworm embryo growth in senior citizens, or some other such less silly thing.
2007-03-27
05:12:07
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Holobunny
1
in
Law & Ethics