First off, I'm not talking about people who are simply pro-life and have a peaceful opinion about it.
By "radicial pro-life advocates" I mean those religious-freaks who scream outside abortion clinics, humiliate & slander women who choose to have an abortion, ect.
Are these people aware that when women who cannot afford [or whatever the reason they don't want their child] a baby that said baby goes into custody of social services and then requires a family to raise it & help him/her grow into a adult. If this cause is sooo important to these people, why aren't they putting their oh-so-great moral attitude to better use and adopting, or even providing foster care, for a child in need ?
I know not everyone can for financial reasons, but if you can't do something about these parentless children, should you really be protesting so strongly against abortion ? Isn't that slight hypocricy - "Well I don't want to adopt that baby but someone needs to take it!"
2007-02-28
08:05:06
·
22 answers
·
asked by
.$. Clare .$.
1
in
Politics