Weapons inspection teams were set up in Iraq in1991. Saddam had built up a chemical arsenal leading up to the Gulf war - and had used them to kill an estimated 20,000 people in the Iraq / Iran war, including 5000 Iraqi Kurds. After playing Saddam's game of telling the inspectors where they were allowed to look and ousting them on several occations - when they left in 1999, because Saddam rejected yet another resolution (Res 1284), they had, prior to their departure, destroyed 48 long range missiles, 14 conventional warheads, 30 chemical warheads, 40,000 chemical munitions and 690 Tons of chemical agents. With no further reliable monitoring of Saddam's CBR activities, there was no way to know whether Saddam had or didn't have any more WMD arsenals.
This is the scenerio when the vote to invade Iraq was taken - again - with this history of non compliance and the weapons that had already been destroyed - How would you have voted?
(None of the above relates to the "bush lied" rhetoric.)
2007-02-23
11:50:11
·
13 answers
·
asked by
LeAnne
7
in
Politics