saying that he is considering changing parties if the Democrats don't pass the funding of the troops surge?
http://www.nysun.com/article/49134
2007-02-23 11:43:04 · 19 answers · asked by John 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
LMAO, libs are doing the exact same thing as they did during in Viet Nam, proving to the world they are weak in supporting our troops and our national security! Lieberman is the only democrat left with any damn sense!
2007-02-23 12:21:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
an influential liberal blogger? wow, seem out international! because of the fact liberal bloggers basically have lots potential in this united states! have not they been powerful in making valuable we get a single-payer healthcare invoice? no longer! calling a liberal blogger "influential" is like calling angelina jolie "skinny-lipped" in that the define is lots removed from the certainty. no person cares what liberal bloggers could say. i'm a liberal, believe it or no longer yet who're you kidding here? interior the international of media, the those with the potential are conservatives. they make and shape the words of an excellent sort of the discussions we've in this united states and you cons be attentive to it. how long have been we relatively conversing approximately "dying panels" even however they have been a entire fiction? heck, we are nonetheless conversing approximately them! i basically heard them reported final week on NPR.
2016-10-01 21:25:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Joe Lieberman is the class of the Senate. They probably hate him already behind closed doors. It's a good thing for the country he beat the millionaire Ned Lamont in November. What ever became of Mr. Lamont?
2007-02-23 11:46:58 · answer #3 · answered by Bawney 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
LIEberman is a filthy lying manipulative chickenspit. Let him go to the Rethuglicans where he belongs and fits in. Good riddance!!!
2007-02-23 12:10:07 · answer #4 · answered by Cerulean 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Bush like the guy a lot
His War funding = $20 Billion to Israel
2007-02-23 11:49:51 · answer #5 · answered by Taco 1 · 4⤊ 4⤋
The last time Joe didn't cozy up to the idealistic democratic agenda, they threw him under the bus.
Welcome back, Joe.
2007-02-23 12:07:54 · answer #6 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Empty threat. He is fine, he is a Democrat. He kissed Bush's butt to save the naval base in CT.
2007-02-23 11:51:38 · answer #7 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
"Say it any so, Joe."
The last word I heard, he said the reporting was "much ado about nothing."
2007-02-23 11:53:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
He took off his democratic face and exposed him self for the neoconservative that he has always been.
He and McCain are a lot alike, their interests lay with the project for a new American century, much also to my surprise so does Hillary.
Obama is looking better all the time.
2007-02-23 11:48:20 · answer #9 · answered by dstr 6 · 4⤊ 5⤋
Did not the libs want this man as Veep- a heartbeat away from the presidency?
2007-02-23 11:46:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋