Do you think it is right that "Dog" Chapman the bounty hunter might face trial in Mexico?

Question

Yes, he broke a law that allows rich criminals to live freely in Mexico and not worry about being bounty hunted. But he did it to catch convicted serial rapist Andruw Luster who was subsuquently sentenced to 124 years in prison. Do you think it is right if the U.S sends this crime fighting icon up the creek without a paddle.

Answer 1

Hell no. Mexico is full of American rapists and murderers that Mexico refuses to extradite. Who cares what the Mexican gov't wants? We don't send many of the illegals back, why should we send one of our own. Mexico's government needs to learn that its place is just where it is on the map: Beneath America.

Answer 2

I do not think that he is anymore racist, then anyone else, who has done time, worked with criminals, dealt with life. I, as a white woman living in one of the largest African-American cities in the world, can honestly say I hear the N word at least 50 times a day, and it is NOT white people saying it. If the African-American community have no respect for the use of the word, how dare they complain when other races of people say it. I dated a black man, who referred to his "folks" as ****** everyday. I think that a private conversation, is that, private and no one Else's business. Where is his son's loyalty anyway. I think it is a big mess, and I really could care less whether his show is canceled or not. I never watch it. This is still for the time being America, and we as Americans have every right to have opinions, and freedom of speech. In fact maybe I should call the press, because I was called a Cracker yesterday by a black woman! We are in serious trouble as a Nation, maybe we should all just move on, raise our families, and try to find peace with one another.

Answer 3

It isn't the U.S.'s position to get involved. He broke a law in Mexico and must deal with the consquences of that. The U.S. is only involved becuse the Mexican government asked that he be brought back. This is the same law that allows the U.S. to extridite people back into the states to face the consquences of breaking a law here. I do find it ironic that the Mexican government is asking the US for help with something that they wouldn't do themselves with Luster.

Answer 4

I do not think that the United States of America should be handing over American citizens to a corrupt third world country that refuses to arrest and hand over criminals to us. Luster is a real criminal. Maybe if we had more Dog Chapmans, there would be less crime.

Answer 5

I think it is appauling that the United States even issued a warrant for the arrest of Dog, his son Leland, and their friend Tim Chapman.

Luster is slime - who drugged and raped women. He fled to Mexico because he was out on bond - which he was only out on because his family had $$$$$$.

Did you know that under our extradition treaty with Mexico that the Mexican government did not have to turn Luster over to the United States because he was tried in absentia which is not recognized in their country. They turned the slime ball over because he entered the country under an illegal name.

Had it not been for the three Chapman men Luster would be raping Mexican woman and tourists now. And don't give me the "FBI would have gotten him legally....blah blah blah".....they were AS USUAL ineffective and by the time they had gotten there Luster would have had notched his bedpost with many more victims.

Answer 6

I think it's ridiculous, the man did a great thing by catching that rapist and this is what he gets for it. Some laws are silly.

However I do think you can't break laws even if they are silly. It would lead to a break down in society. What if everyone decided to be a vigilante, the reasons to get someone would get less and less until there was chaos.

So I guess I think while it is totally wrong for him to be charged with this, but see why they have to do it.

Answer 7

i wont get into the technicalities of american/mexican extradition policies,but to say its one-sided would be an understatement.in mexico,the crime dog commited is a simple mis-demeanor.the crooked officials are obviously using him for leverage and probly fishing for bribes.dog broke the law.vigilanteism cannot be tolerated.however,justice cant always be acheived through the letter of the law.dogs celebrity should not be a factor but given the dubious motivations of the mex government,i think america should give them a middle finger raised high in the air.

Answer 8

No, Dog got the scum off the street for women safety,now USA is got him jailed,How many want Luster released,if USA wants to turn Dog over to Mexico they should have to release Luster,because he was caught by breaking the law.I say s***w Mexico and let Dog keep crime off the street.

Answer 9

No. He went by the book, got advice from the authorities and they gave him the wrong advice or so the authorities say. Now they say to bad so sad and want to charge him for doing something good. The US needs to tell Mexico, sorry but this isn't going to happen, were not going to send him to you.

Answer 10

The fascination with Crime and Punishment in our society is truly disheartening. Dog represents the establishment breaking the law--and would serve as a great precedent to prosecuting and punishing those in the establishment that break the law.

Anything to get the idea in the public's mind that prosecuting those that are supposed to be the models(i.e. the Bush Regime) for our society--regardless of thier intentions--can be the norm is a good thing.