Politics & Government - 3 February 2007

I can't think of any.

2007-02-03 02:25:27 · 14 answers · asked by Frank 2 in Politics

Why do people blaim America for killing innocent people in war?

Please.....

First of all we are the nicest nation in war there probably ever was. The people we are fight now in Iraq and Afgan would not show the kindness we have shown. What nation gives back land? Twice!

Second, If Mr. Abu or whatever would like to go hide behind some kid and his family. Then he is to blaim for getting them killed. We are not required to lose 10 American soldiers for one kid. It's not right and not our faults...

2007-02-03 02:24:25 · 13 answers · asked by AlienJack J 3 in Military

2007-02-03 02:23:58 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

2007-02-03 02:22:48 · 3 answers · asked by EDWARD D 1 in Government

2007-02-03 02:22:28 · 7 answers · asked by mikeygonebad07 1 in Government

(a) more socialism (just a little bit more)
(b) less socialism (just a little bit less)
(c) stay the way it is
(d) absolute socialism
(e) absolute capitalism
(f) something else(please explain)

2007-02-03 02:20:12 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Its like the exact opposite of their homeland

2007-02-03 02:18:00 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Our government officials and their families never got involved with people like Saddam and Ossama in the past. I mean because Bush and Rumsfeld Used to be friends with them. Do you think if we never got involved with them in the first place they would have done with they did?

2007-02-03 02:14:58 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

I can't escape the fact that the direction we are heading in is one of a massively polarised society in which there are some people (and with globalisation, nations) who have financial control over material wealth, & others who do the work & yet have no control. Massively disparate levels of relative wealth in societies that call themselves committed to equality & freedom causes discontent as the gulf between principle & reality deepens. Looking at the prevalence of cheap (& in some cases free) labour for the health of global capitalism, to which there has been no challenge since the collapse of the Soviet Union, should we just have masters and unwaged slaves & simply encourage the masters to treat the slaves well and look after them? Should we, in other words, embrace the feudal society fully, as this is what we have in effect already but the disparity between the liberal ideal & the reality causes discontent rather than people simply knowing their place? What is the alternative?

2007-02-03 02:13:41 · 20 answers · asked by RonanJ 1 in Other - Politics & Government

For instance, pointing out a negative, lying on an opponent or taking a truth and putting a negative spin on it. I would much rather hear a candidate tell me about themselves and what their plans are if they win.

2007-02-03 02:11:50 · 9 answers · asked by Unicorn2 1 in Politics

SHELBY COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION

2007-02-03 02:09:49 · 3 answers · asked by TRIX M 1 in Law Enforcement & Police

The people devastated by the tornadoes that ripped through Florida ?

America is ALWAYS FIRST to lend a helping hand !!!! FIRST !!!!!!
It would serve well, for EVERYBODY to look-up Gordon Sinclair and Byron Macgregor.. . . .. and I'll leave it at that !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-02-03 02:07:21 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Best answer gets posted on my website:

http://www.therealamericantruth.com

2007-02-03 02:05:58 · 16 answers · asked by Buffman316 1 in Other - Politics & Government

Can u pay money for ur record 2 b deleted? if so, how much?

2007-02-03 02:05:18 · 2 answers · asked by krispiemeow 3 in Other - Politics & Government

2007-02-03 02:04:30 · 2 answers · asked by ProLife Liberal 5 in Military

do they keep some secrets from him?
examples:
up coming miltery design
ufo's 1946 & ect.

2007-02-03 02:00:26 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

2007-02-03 01:58:26 · 17 answers · asked by A True Gentleman 5 in Politics

If Global Warming is a hoax, what exactly is the scientific communities reasoning for lying to the World? And what do they benefit from it?

2007-02-03 01:57:00 · 22 answers · asked by Mrs. Bass 7 in Politics

We know that Prescott Bush was caught and ordered to cease and decist, by the U.S. Government for trading with the Nazis. In fact he refused to stop supporting the Nazis and he financed Hitler's rise to power. The Bush family assets were frozen by the U.S. Government in an attempt to stop this Nazi sipporter.

How many similarities are there between him and his grandson?

2007-02-03 01:56:15 · 7 answers · asked by Brotherhood 7 in Politics

or is it something else?,,,,speak your skinny man,,and lady,s i give you extra points,,,decider

2007-02-03 01:55:03 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-02-03 01:53:26 · 20 answers · asked by indianborntowin 2 in Civic Participation

2007-02-03 01:51:48 · 17 answers · asked by citizen high 6 in Politics

2007-02-03 01:50:01 · 7 answers · asked by indianborntowin 2 in Politics

The issue is federal funding. Why? Because there's no other source for the money! Why do they want the money if the research is going to lead nowhere? It doesn't matter. They want the money. Everybody needs a living. Hey, if you could live off the federal government with grants instead of working, would you do that? Why don't these researchers go out, if they're so brainy, why don't they borrow the money? If it's so promising, do what everybody else does: go borrow money. But no, there's in assumption the government must pay for it. "Why this is health! Why, this is medicine! The government must pay for this."

Well, no, the government shouldn't, especially if it's a black hole. Its' the same thing here with global warming. It's all about funding, and the people who want funding from the governments that believe this thing will write reports saying human beings are the sole cause, the primary cause, whatever, of global warming. There are others who, on the basis of their own research, say, "No, you can't prove it yet," and so the clowns that are running around trying to get government money from all over the world then turn what they're doing around, they say, "Ah, these people are being funded by Big Oil, these people being are being funded by people that pollute and want to keep polluting so that they don't have to be held accountable for the global warming."
The bottom line is there's no consensus in science on this, and there's nothing in science that says embryonic stem cells show promise. So what we have here is the politicization of medicine. This is the sad and shocking thing. We used to approach the cure for diseases in a truly bipartisan way, but now we don't. Now we've got Democrats and their allies with commercials all over saying certain Republicans are against curing this disease that you have or your friends have or other Americans have. They don't want people to get better, and so what we have, Democrats lying to sick people in this country, creating false hope (which is truly cruel) that this line of research will lead to something substantive, when it won't.

Even the people who say it might, say we need 15 to 20 years. Where have we heard that? In 1994 I heard we need 20 years to prove global warming, but we can't afford to wait because if we're wrong, it will be too late to stop it. Well, it's 20 years, and they still say, "We need more time. We can't afford to wait." Others are saying it's too late. They're all over the ballpark. Others are saying, "We can't fix global warming." Well, if we can't fix it, how the hell could we have caused it? It's just simple logic. If we're the reasons for it, and it's happening, then we ought to be able to stop what we're doing. But no, no, no, the problem's gone so far, the earth is now more powerful than we are.

It wasn't 20 years ago we had the power to totally destroy the climate on this planet, but we don't anymore because it's gotten so bad, we've so destroyed it, there's nothing we can do to fix it. That's what some of them say. They're all over the ballpark. But this is all about funding. Now, they've already politicized science, and let there be no mistake. We've talked about this. There's a presumption just like there is with law enforcement, they never lie, they never falsely accuse. They never go after the wrong guy. Why would they? They're the good guys. They're the guys with white hats. They're trying to spare us and save us from all the evil that's out there.

"Science? Why, these are these guys in white coats and the lab coats, and they're out there trying to cure disease and so forth. They wouldn't lie!" Yes, they will. They will lie for money; they will mislead for money. They politicize the arts; they politicize the English language. The liberals have politicized everything, and I just have to laugh when I listen to the liberals talk about how partisan conservatives are and how divisive Republicans and conservatives are. How the hell more divisive can you be than to run ads on television accusing Republicans of not wanting to cure people who have terminal diseases?

How much more divisive can it be than when it's a flat-out lie. When their spokesman hasn't even read the constitutional amendment in Missouri on which they're based, how in the world are you supposed to trust anything? That amendment, in fact, everybody gets caught up talking about it as a stem cell amendment because they very cleverly titled it stem cell research and whatever it is. It's a pro-cloning amendment, and the embryonic stem cell people say, "We're not killing embryos, we're cloning them! We're cloning embryos, and we're not going to kill any embryos. This is not an abortion issue."

They're doing everything they can to obfuscate what they really want to do, but it's nothing more than your typical liberal money grab. All money is theirs, as long as they can get somebody to get into your back pocket and take it out of your back pocket and hand it over to them, and that's what global warming is all about, that's what embryonic stem cell research is all about, and we see this massive new green tax increase being proposed for the UK, sit tight, folks. With the right people in Washington, it'll happen here.

2007-02-03 01:47:32 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

in the special oylimpics

2007-02-03 01:47:32 · 4 answers · asked by AlienJack J 3 in Elections

Do u think that people from other countries should have to speak clear english when they move to the U.S??

2007-02-03 01:45:34 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

2007-02-03 01:44:04 · 11 answers · asked by aoilondon 1 in Law & Ethics

My sons father committed suicide a month after he turned a year old. He worked for his parents and they never paid him in a check. Therefore he never paid any taxes. My son who will now be 9 years this year has never recieved any kind of child support or help. His parents do help with school stuff and from time to time, but it's not the same as support. I have seen lawyers about this but they all tell me there's nothing I can do. Is there a way to make his parents pay for it since they were the ones who never paid him? PLEASE IF U KNOW ANYTHING??

2007-02-03 01:43:42 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

Al didn't invent the internet, nor does Hillary own Exxon/Mobil, but she sure talks like she does....telling us what she's going to do with their profits when she's prez..... I'd tell you my true impressions of Hillary...but I wouln't want to offend caninedom.

2007-02-03 01:42:04 · 8 answers · asked by aBranch@60-WA ,<>< 4 in Other - Politics & Government

if so should not they be bombed by America,,,like now,before they use them on our troops in Iraq?

2007-02-03 01:36:29 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics