everybody that defends bush says he is doing a great thing, that he needed to attack them first, and we need a strong president who isnt afraid to "do whats right." but imagine if bush had been president in 1962, during the cuban missle crisis. we had pictures (=proof) that the soviets had WMD, specifically nuclear weapons. with bush's mentality, he would have launched an invasion to eliminate them. then they would have launched their missles, we would launch ours, and the world would be devastated. he would have had our nation destroyed. so is his policy really as good as many of you argue? why does war always have to be an answer?
2007-01-24
08:44:34
·
9 answers
·
asked by
2010 CWS Champs!
3
in
Politics