You've got my attention! But there is a LOT more to being the President than this. What are your views on:
Illegal immigration
social security
the war in iraq
the economy
education
taxes
crime
gun control
campaign reform
the racial divide in this country
the plight of the farmers
homeland security
terrorism
free speech
wire-tapping
and the national debt?
Also, what are your career qualifications? What do you know about government? Foreign affairs? Bi-partisan politics? Perhaps most importantly at all, how would you deal with the economic crisis that would be caused by NOT giving money to other countries? I like your thinking! But it is a much bigger and complex issue that that!
2007-01-24 16:50:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mr. Taco 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't know, how would you get the money for the poor? Would you be expecting me to work 40+ hours a week and them give that money to someone who said aw hell with work I got a hogger to blow? Would you stand up against someone who killed my friends who were at work trying to pat for the poor or would you just sit by and say well that was too bad? If you are committed to doing what is right for the country I don't care what party you are from you will get my vote.
2007-01-24 16:47:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by joevette 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It all depends on who the poor are you reference. If by poor you mean those, who for mitigating circumstances, cannot take care of themselves; sure I'd vote for you. I have no problem taking care of those who cannot care for themselves. I do have a problem with supporting a lazy dope head sitting on his poorch drinking beer all day, or a baby factory whore who cant keep her legs closed. If you don't work and you can, the good book says you shall not eat. In other words lazy people should be forced to work, if they will not, let em die.
2007-01-24 16:51:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would depend on what you mean by helping. If you mean helping them get an education to get a better job and become more successful and self-sufficient. Then yes.
If you want to increase their welfare checks I would throw tomatoes at you and hit you with a stick.
2007-01-24 16:47:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO, we do not need Ghandi. we need an intelligent fair person.
you cannot give anything away to one person until you first take it from some other. we just need a level playing field. eliminate corporate subsidies and tax advantages etc.
2007-01-24 16:48:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You're Hugo Chavez aren't you?
2007-01-24 17:20:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Stormchaser 5
·
1⤊
0⤋