Politics & Government - 9 October 2006

well im one of you.in regards to the immigration policies in this country .who would you vote for if there was a general lection tomorrow.

2006-10-09 02:35:45 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

As you know (hopefully) N Korea tested its first nuclear bomb today.. and we all know this because the country blantantly announced it themselves. Why this frankness when they know that countries around the world will condemn them? Iran is so secretive about its nuclear program, but N Korea is definitely not. Is it in response to US hegemony? Is it to gain hegemony?

2006-10-09 02:35:42 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

Dean and many others in the Democrat party are offering to give amnesty to illegals if the hispanics help them win this election.

I am not sure if there is something illegal in this offer. I do know if you believe in polls, 75% of Americans are against amnesty so it seems that this offer of amnesty is wrong.

Should the Dems have a majority in Congress if they promise one group of people something America does not want?

Should the Dems have any seats at all for selling America to the highest bidder?

This offer to sell out Americans for votes makes me angry and I do not think I can support any Democrat again.

2006-10-09 02:35:20 · 6 answers · asked by rmagedon 6 in Other - Politics & Government

the fact is if pearl harbout hadnt been bombed they probably wouldn't have bothered.

and why do brits and americans argue so much?

i am british my boyfriend is half american, i have nothing against americans just certain things about america i do not like, like bush.

2006-10-09 02:34:42 · 34 answers · asked by kiki_dees 3 in Other - Politics & Government

Dean and many others in the Democrat party are offering to give amnesty to illegals if the hispanics help them win this election.

I am not sure if there is something illegal in this offer. I do know if you believe in polls, 75% of Americans are against amnesty so it seems that this offer of amnesty is wrong.

Should the Dems have a majority in Congress if they promise one group of people something America does not want?

Should the Dems have any seats at all for selling America to the highest bidder?

This offer to sell out Americans for votes makes me angry and I do not think I can support any Democrat again.

2006-10-09 02:33:28 · 11 answers · asked by rmagedon 6 in Immigration

.the new pearl harbour by Griffin?If not why not?Or is the source of your info CNN and popular mechanics?

2006-10-09 02:33:02 · 3 answers · asked by Paul I 4 in Government

So many analysts and political hot-shots were saying that we should just leave N korea alone back when they were test firing missles into Japanese air space. They were soooo many years from producing long range weaponry or nuclear weapons.

Yeeeeeeah.

Where are those people now?

2006-10-09 02:30:45 · 10 answers · asked by amosunknown 7 in Politics

do they have a short memory...

In 1983, Democratic congressman Gerry Studds was found to have sexually propositioned a 17-year-old male whom he took on a trip to Portugal. The 46-year-old Studds indignantly attacked those who criticized him for what he called a "mutually voluntary, private relationship between adults."

2006-10-09 02:30:23 · 13 answers · asked by turntable 6 in Law & Ethics

2006-10-09 02:29:00 · 12 answers · asked by nguyendien22 1 in Other - Politics & Government

2006-10-09 02:28:50 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-10-09 02:27:54 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

2006-10-09 02:25:19 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Do you really think that WWIII will be nuclear? Is man kind that stupid to destroy the world just for a quick victory (which actually won't be that quick)
I truly can't see WWIII being nuclear, but if so Albert Einstiens famous quote will be right.

2006-10-09 02:23:29 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

I think they could actually do some good.

2006-10-09 02:23:19 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-10-09 02:22:53 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-10-09 02:20:23 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

... to back anything up?

Is that sort of like the "intelligence" about Iraq having WMD, do those tiny viles of mustard gas held by an unthreatening jerky dictator who kept al -qaeda out of his country scare you more than North Korea's nuclear bombs, million man army, brutal totalitarian dictatorship and need to "prove" something to America, just incase we get any bright ideas?
How will we be able to fight a hostile nation like that when we are spread so thin militarily in constant Middle Eastern conflicts done for questionable reasons?

2006-10-09 02:17:54 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

This was the fallacy that was our Foreign Policy.. Taking on weaker opposition when the real threat was looking right at us.

As someone else said.. America cannot control the whole world. Diplomacy rather than War was all we wanted not the NEOCON way. Now we cannot control anyone.

2006-10-09 02:17:39 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-10-09 02:10:38 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

2006-10-09 02:07:52 · 17 answers · asked by Rollingstone 1 in Military

I can understand cracking down on dug dealers. But why are
they kicking people out of their homes for stuggling with addictions?
How does this help their addiction?
How does this cut down on homelessness?
How does it prevent crime?
How does it ease the back-logged court system?
How does it cut down on prison overcrowding?
How does it ease the tax burden that pays for it all?

Anthony Silva
Great Legislator

2006-10-09 02:04:49 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2006-10-09 02:03:39 · 9 answers · asked by Rollingstone 1 in Military

Whilst we were being distracted by Iraq, the real world terrorist was at work. Now what?

2006-10-09 02:03:23 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Source: every questions I have ever asked on here.

2006-10-09 02:02:49 · 9 answers · asked by buffman316 2 in Politics

1. Agree with most issues/platform
2. Family - grew up with certain party and beliefs
3. One or two major issues that keep you in the party
4. OTHER

2006-10-09 02:02:38 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

a man goes into a house to rob it only to find that the owener of the house is still inside. on running away the owner chases the robber and catches him and hits him a few times leaving bruses.. is this neglegence

2006-10-09 02:01:04 · 24 answers · asked by smallfry 1 in Law & Ethics

Doesn't this destroy years of civil rights work to protect people
on thier jobs who don't ave Unions?
Isn't it just a cop-out because government is back-logged on cases?
We need people on thie jobs, to relieve tax burden, and cut down on welfare and crime!

Anthony Silva
Great Legislator

2006-10-09 02:01:00 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

I think it does.
Hollywood = crazy liberal "freaks" and perverts - he sure fits that!

2006-10-09 01:58:17 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

They sell marijuana in ''clubs'' in Hayward, Ca. The city council approved their establishment.
Since this is a federal crime should a citizen report it to the feds?
The dispensary owners are getting super rich. They don't charge sales tax or pay F. I. C. A. for their employees. State law simply does not permit sales-for-profit so they are criminal operations even by state law.

2006-10-09 01:57:52 · 16 answers · asked by cal4204u 2 in Law Enforcement & Police

Surely cyclists should have priority (right of way) when using dedicated cycle paths, otherwise what is the point of creating them. I certainly don't feel as safe as I should knowing that a car can suddenly appear in front of me, from a private drive.

2006-10-09 01:56:46 · 11 answers · asked by Florence-Anna 5 in Other - Politics & Government