Has any believers of official 9/11 report read both the 9/11 commission report and?

Question

.the new pearl harbour by Griffin?If not why not?Or is the source of your info CNN and popular mechanics?

Answer 1

Terrorists exist:
http://www.911myths.com
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
http://origin.www.gpoaccess.gov/911/


For those who are still conspiracy believers:

http://zapatopi.net/afdb/

Answer 2

I don't believe the official 9/11 Conmission Report.

It has too many holes, and leaves too many questions unanswered, like for example, what happened to WTC7.

The NIST is the same. It never mentions how the main structure of the building, the core, was demolished. It's entire explanation and diagrams only applies to buildings with no core.

I think the point is that there is so much information available on both sides, that you end up finding what you want to find, and believing what you want to believe, so information which demostrates why the government might want to destroy these buildings, kill 3000 people, and create a war is important to a clear understanding.

If people become aware of the following, then 9/11 is easier to understand.

The Federal Reserve is a private company.
The IRS has no founding in law.
There is a group of very rich people which control governments, corporations, politics, secret services, education, medicine, oil, armaments, banks, media, and most of the things which affect our social lives.

Answer 3

The problem with conspiracy's is that you can not prove them!
I do agree there are to many problems that have not been sufficiently answered