English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

do they have a short memory...

In 1983, Democratic congressman Gerry Studds was found to have sexually propositioned a 17-year-old male whom he took on a trip to Portugal. The 46-year-old Studds indignantly attacked those who criticized him for what he called a "mutually voluntary, private relationship between adults."

2006-10-09 02:30:23 · 13 answers · asked by turntable 6 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

13 answers

and clinton sexually harrassed and RAPED a few women who have come forward over the years, and the DEMS have SHUNNED them, claiming they are making it up and that these women are part of some VAST RIZGHT WING CONSPIRACY (Hillary's words, not mine) to tarnish Clinton.

Turns out, he harassed another 21 year old fat girl and used her as a HUMIDOR in the oval office. Making most people think all those old allegations were true.

Funny how DEMS claim to support women's rights but when a assaulted woman comes forward they think its a lie.

Dems even tried to ban rock/rap in the 1980's with Tipper and Al Gore and the PMRC.

Do as I say, not as I do is the Dem Moral SLogan.

Pathetic.

2006-10-09 02:34:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

The Dems aren't yelling and screaming about Foley's actions. Foley sent explicit emails to underage pages, he was outed, then he stepped down. If that was all that happened, the Dem's would have very little to say.

What is so upsetting is the cover-up at the highest levels of house leadership. Believe me, if the Dem's were busted covering up Studds' actions, the Republicans would have been just as upset as the Dem's are now.

2006-10-09 08:00:23 · answer #2 · answered by David 3 · 0 1

You know who was there clapping? Nancy Pelosi. Now, she's outraged? How convenient. I have no doubt that some Democrats (not politicians) are sickened by Foley and Studds, but the politicians they have are just so ......beyond my comprehension hypocrits. I mean at least Foley resigned having not had sex.

2006-10-09 02:35:19 · answer #3 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0 0

You don't even have to go back that far.
Bill Clinton was diddling the intern in the most coveted office in the free world.

It is wrong in both cases, and they should both go to jail.

The funniest thing is this. The democrats are the ones for "people's rights" and the rights of the abused, yet they are the ones that condoned Clinton's actions when ANY CEO or ANY other person in authority did it, they would be canned in a heart beat.

2006-10-09 02:38:14 · answer #4 · answered by Truth 2 · 0 1

There are deviants and pervs in the two events as properly as human beings who in simple terms made a undesirable judgment in errors, the version being while a DEM does it its ok, aka "all adult men cheat" yet while a REP does something, the media and maximum liberals are out for blood. you understand that in simple terms approximately each and every DEM president over the final 50 years has had adultery subject concerns/preserving it of their pants, JFK, Johnson, Clinton, (Carter being the exception) yet different than for IKE under very diverse circumstances in the previous he became president not one of the REP's have or been shown to have (i think of Bush senior became accused of it as quickly as). Oh and how approximately Edwards answer to the question of cheating on his spouse, in his reaction he stated he had enjoyed a similar females for 30 years persistently, yet not as quickly as denied having had or being in a courting with yet another females, i think of an ordinary NO could have sufficed, till of direction added down the line while caught, the NO could be seen an extremely final "answer", the place by way of fact the "30 years" isn't something extra suitable than a "remark". So hi, he can't be accused of mendacity.

2016-11-27 02:31:21 · answer #5 · answered by gerdsen 4 · 0 0

They only ask a higher standard of morality, because these guys took office promising to bring morality back to Washington.
This is the most immoral bunch ever made it there!!

2006-10-09 02:33:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 1 0

You got it wrong. The Dems don't try to legislate morality, the hypocritical Republicans do! That's what makes it all the more sinister.
Limbaugh- fat drug addict, deniar
Bush- drunk, druggie, violent war-mongerer
Foley- gay, pederast
Hastert- gluttonous, liar, greedy

They try telling Americans what to do in private, when they are the ones that need to follow their own advice.
At least the Dems don't try to legislate perceived morality.

2006-10-09 02:35:54 · answer #7 · answered by Duque de Alba 3 · 1 0

That still does not take away the fact that there are still people in Congress who have cyber sex with underage children. Thats regardless of whether you are a democrat or repulbican.

2006-10-09 02:33:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's not the first Mr. Studds, is found to be a bisexual. Which he don't belong in the Congress! He belongs, someplace else.
I'll bet all of you my answer will be erased!!

2006-10-09 02:34:29 · answer #9 · answered by alfonso 5 · 0 1

All parties have immoral party members....The only group you can locate with morality intact would be Jesus' supper table..& even then,...well lets just say no one is perfect!

2006-10-09 02:38:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers