2006-10-09 02:25:19 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
For the record, I have two degrees. A B.A. in criminal justice and a B.A. in philosophy.
2006-10-09 02:49:39 · update #1
I feel Bush is in the lead to this very good question. He has put us right in the middle of clear and present danger (Iraq). There is no way he can graciously bow out. I pray that our next elected president will have enough sense to get us out. We are losing our troops for no reason.
2006-10-09 02:31:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
seventy 5% universal or seventy 5% of those polled. enable me wager... They polled those human beings for the time of a weekend and maximum human beings of those polled have been between the an prolonged time of 18 and 24. you're implying that seventy 5% of the inhabitants in large Britain have faith Bush is extra risky than Kim Jong Il and Ahmadinejad. this is seventy 5% of those polled. not seventy 5% of the finished inhabitants. If it have been genuine that seventy 5% of the finished inhabitants believes your declare, i think sorry for you human beings. God supply help to. playstation ... it is not a remember of devaluing your opinion. You knowingly tried to alter the data that your opinion have been in accordance with. As for "If human beings of vote casting age are deemed to blame sufficient to circulate with their representatives in government, why devalue their opinion whilst it is composed of polls?" properly, a individual who might knowingly alter the data to purpose and bypass off their opinion as a valid reason isn't to blame sufficient to circulate with their representatives in government in my opinion. they have alittle bit extra maturing to do. hint hint
2016-10-19 01:59:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, Bush is certainly stupid and he shows that as soon as he appears somewhere, let alone opens his mouth. Of course he would be perfectly able to destroy this planet. Kim Jong Il doesn't have the capability yet, but is certainly smarter than Bush. Well... my bottom is smarter than that.
2006-10-09 02:31:37 · answer #3 · answered by The answer man 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I hope that neither one will do anything stupid like destroying the world, I have a few good years left.
2006-10-09 02:35:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
THATS really a toss up.
Unfortunatly idiots like your first reponder will still have their heads up thier asses about imaginary enemies like "liberals" even as they are on the brink of complete nuclear destruction.
2006-10-09 02:31:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Jong....Bush has some great back up forces,not so sure about that dudes entourage..
2006-10-09 02:30:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think we've got two insane people behind the button.
2006-10-09 03:12:28 · answer #7 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Liberals
2006-10-09 02:26:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 7⤋
Great question, but I would like to see both of them in a caged ring, no gloves, no protection, and only one walk out. You can beat it won't be GB.
2006-10-09 02:29:08 · answer #9 · answered by matt2fit 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Stupid Bush found a way to become the leader of the most powerful country in the world. (TWICE) while you flip burgers
2006-10-09 02:29:30 · answer #10 · answered by carolinatinpan 5 · 1⤊ 6⤋