Those Bunker Bursting Bombs.. Shouldn't they have gone to N.Korea instead of Iran?

Question

This was the fallacy that was our Foreign Policy.. Taking on weaker opposition when the real threat was looking right at us.

As someone else said.. America cannot control the whole world. Diplomacy rather than War was all we wanted not the NEOCON way. Now we cannot control anyone.

Answer 1

I am sure you mean Iraq.

But yes, North Korea was a much better and much more pressing problem to be dealt with, but the Bush junta knew that there is no oil in North Korea; hence Iraq (or any other oil rich country) was going to get it.
In North Korea we just would have had a humanitarian crisis on our hands, not more.

Answer 2

There is no safe armed retaliation to a nuclear threat, it would be suicide.The peoples of the world must learn to talk together, to learn more about each other.In some countries the people are `brainwashed` by their governments,and are not allowed "outside" information. The Korean people,have been taught to hate westerners, they think the west is full of rich people who want to over run their country,we are the "baddies" their government is the "goodie"They are told it is "them" or "us". So they think they will be doing humanity a favour by eradicating us.

Answer 3

No bombs should be used against anyone before diplomacy.

Answer 4

Doom & Gloom ehh chicken little .
Oh now North Koreas a threat last week it was nothing more than RNC talking points for Neo-cons according to you.

Answer 5

don't worry, they have a monstrous stock pile of every kind of bomb for every kind of foreigner.

Answer 6

yes. those people are DESPERATE in that country.

Answer 7

nah...........they should just nuke korea, nasty little fekers.