Politics & Government - 30 September 2006

The 19 that voted against border security? Do any of these clowns belong to you? What will you tell them in November?

NAYs ---19
Akaka (D-HI)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Chafee (R-RI)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Inouye (D-HI)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Kerry (D-MA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Murray (D-WA)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Sarbanes (D-MD)

2006-09-30 08:12:17 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

2006-09-30 08:11:42 · 15 answers · asked by mat67 2 in Politics

They can ban what they like, without infriging the human rights act
they can boycot what they like and dont pay there fines, who do these Frenchies think they are??????

2006-09-30 08:11:13 · 5 answers · asked by charliecat 2 in Politics

do think they we're talkin about them? they're not important, why would we talk about them???
i can speak watever language i want! if u wanna know wat im sayin then u should learn spanish or watever!

2006-09-30 08:08:49 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

There are many charities that need warm bodies. Do any of the anti-war liberals do more than whine. Do any of you actually donate hours at soup kitchens, community gardens, Peace Corps. If not, you are past due needing to shut your pie hole.

2006-09-30 08:07:14 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Civic Participation

If Clinton was President When 9-11 happened and all evidence pointed to Bin Laden but some how Clinton tied Saddam Hussian to it. Even saying he have evidence that Saddam had WMDs and a attack was enevitable. Wouldn't Republicans think he was doing it to boost his poll numbers, use the sentament of 9-11 as a blank check to attack Saddam and to " Wag the Dog?"

2006-09-30 08:07:08 · 20 answers · asked by meanblacktiger 5 in Politics

Doesnt George Jr. know that he already fought a war in a third world country and lost?

2006-09-30 08:06:40 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,1-523-1650822-523,00.html

2006-09-30 08:03:43 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

is it appropriate for the supreme court or any other gov't body to have power over the president such as the supreme court could have exercised in Marbury v. Madison? why or why not?

2006-09-30 07:59:18 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

For several decades, NORAD had standing orders to automatically scramble fighters immediately upon a report of any highjacking. In July of '01, "president" Bush changed that order. Under the new standing order, no scrambling was allowed without the express order from the Secretary of Defence (Donald Rumsfeld). This order stood for about 3 months...from 2 months before until a few weeks after 9/11. If this order had not been put into effect, fighters would have been scrambled and the planes would have either been escorted to the closest secure airport or shot down.

Regardless of who planned and executed the 9/11 attacks, and regardless of any intelligence available or not available, "President" Bush's order allowed 9/11 to happen.

That change of orders seems rather idiotic, doesn't it? An order for NORAD NOT to scramble in an emergency? Or perhaps it was part of the plan...after all, Bush has been shown to have a genius IQ (at least according to some).

2006-09-30 07:59:04 · 21 answers · asked by corwynwulfhund 3 in Politics

The problem is not the people! The problem is the broken and obsolete segregational system.

2006-09-30 07:57:36 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

I've read several articles of Muslims raiding the mostly Christian south of Sudan and killing tens of thousands. If the news is true, give me stats on how many have died and how many are left.

2006-09-30 07:54:49 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

He will and also his partners will keep kicking asses of stupid Americans and its alies .

2006-09-30 07:53:38 · 15 answers · asked by Extrimist 1 in Military

ask no q's get asked none

2006-09-30 07:53:09 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

2006-09-30 07:52:44 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

He will and also his partners will keep kicking asses of stupid Americans and its alies .

2006-09-30 07:52:28 · 5 answers · asked by Extrimist 1 in Military

2006-09-30 07:51:55 · 7 answers · asked by Dr.O 5 in Politics

2006-09-30 07:51:02 · 1 answers · asked by Joey's Back 6 in Law & Ethics

Why does Fox News have to keep on reminding us that they are fair and balanced. Shouldn't the viewers decide that, or is it that if you say it enough times, people wil believe it? Or maybe they're just not?

2006-09-30 07:48:14 · 19 answers · asked by who me 2 in Other - Politics & Government

We should be proud of our race and have as many as possible.
What's wrong with being proud of what you are?

2006-09-30 07:48:00 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

The state of California has a wage garnishment against me. Not for child support or debt collectors. I'm sure its back regisrtation charges.

2006-09-30 07:47:06 · 3 answers · asked by Sean D 1 in Law & Ethics

if its not a christian country than why is every president a christian, why is christmas a national holiday, why is there a church on every corner and why is in god( or in myth we trust as i say) in god we trust on money? and why is 85 percent of the population losers (christians)? and why would any non christian wanna fight for this christian theocracy country of america, i'm an atheist and i wouldnt fight for this theocracy garbage, it would be like someone who wasnt black fighting for an african country

2006-09-30 07:47:01 · 17 answers · asked by Henry 1 in Military

Build the fence. Theyre still trying to enable there illegals to get in. Who cares what they think!

2006-09-30 07:46:20 · 14 answers · asked by smokindoggy 2 in Government

There is little doubt that Bubba could have stopped it but didn't.

Thanks again Bubba, on behalf of a million people killed because you were too busy getting BJ's.

2006-09-30 07:46:06 · 18 answers · asked by marceldev29 4 in Politics

I'm talking about on the municipal level - please, no answers about Bush and Cheney et al., getting DWIs. I'm not interested in a Republican vs Democrat debate.

The defendant goes to AA regularly, and did an outpatient therapy program for 11 weeks immediately following his arrest.

Love Jack

2006-09-30 07:42:39 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

Every chance they get, Democrats chip away at the 2nd Amendment. Whether enacting more draconian laws, or just outright stripping the law-abiding citizen of his guns, Democrats are gung-ho to deny our rights.

Democrat Ray Nagin proved to be every freedom-loving American's worst nightmare. Nagin ordered the N.O.P.D. to illegally confiscate firearms from people. During a federally declared emergency, he abused his power and abandoned the very people he was sworn to protect. He took away the victims' freedom and their basic means of self-defense during an ill-fated and perilous time.

It's no wonder the voters don't trust Demcorats on 2nd Amendment issues. Aren't you sick of Democrats and their utter contempt for our 2nd Amendment rights?

2006-09-30 07:42:33 · 16 answers · asked by college_republicans_club 2 in Politics

2006-09-30 07:39:49 · 10 answers · asked by samuraiged888 1 in Law & Ethics

you're gonna say that not all of you are like that, but the fact remains that most of you are so stupid you can't find your state on the map

2006-09-30 07:39:47 · 37 answers · asked by ionut*999 3 in Other - Politics & Government

"Texas Sens. Kay Bailey Hutchison and John Cornyn voted for the fence bill. But they failed in their effort to amend the fence bill. They wanted to allow border communities to have some input in where fencing will be located and how much of it is erected in their areas.

Hutchison said she received a commitment from the Senate Majority Leader and the Speaker of the House promising to address the concerns when Congress returns from recess."

The problem is, there are localities fully willing to be 'sanctuaries' that will not want any fence in their area. It won't be because a fence is ineffective, but because they are opposed to having an effective fence. These cities create a hole in our border defense and are a concern for the entire country.

What do you think?

And do you think we should be asking Frist and Hastert to stick to the current bill and not modify it to include this requested amendment?

http://www.news8austin.com/content/your_news/default.asp?ArID=171586

2006-09-30 07:39:04 · 5 answers · asked by DAR 7 in Immigration

I've heard....
It was stated that in the Constitution, once Texas became a state, that they had the right to not only seceed, but to become their own contry if they so choose. Is that true?

2006-09-30 07:39:00 · 10 answers · asked by megadeathplowman 1 in Government