http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,1-523-1650822-523,00.html
2006-09-30 08:03:43 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
He wanted in on the looting of Iraq...I guess he was salivating at the thought of access to oil and power through alliance with the biggest terrorist gang of all, the US government...it seems it hasn't worked out as he had imagined!
2006-09-30 08:14:33 · answer #1 · answered by peace m 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, he'll be gone soon, and his legacy would always be the failed Iraq war anyway. Hopefully his replacement won't be so keen on randomly "reforming" everything in the hope something drastically improves, and gets remembered.
2006-09-30 15:07:32 · answer #2 · answered by kirun 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not about a "war on terror" or "fighting for freedoms". Here's why Blair told his ministers that they need any "excuse" to go to war!!!... Are you ready for THIS!?!!!...
http://www.strayreality.com/Lanis_Strayreality/iraq.htm
2006-10-01 00:08:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There were so many reasons to go to war that they had trouble picking one.
2006-09-30 15:05:20 · answer #4 · answered by korines 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋