I watch the news a lot - I watched all the president's speeches. I don't like how Bush presents himself, and I think he's got a lot of things wrong in his head, but going into Iraq makes a lot of sense when you're looking IN GENERAL for terrorists. I don't think Bush claimed ONCE that Iraq had anything to do with Al Qeida or was in any way affiliated with 9/11. I watched every speech, and he didn't claim that they were connected. He DID say though, that Saddam is a power capable of such acts, and can't be allowed to rule the state when he does not comply with UN resolutions to ensure that he is not plotting terrorism, storing ANY weapons, building an army... etc. These were all in the UN resolution written post Iraq War I, and for about 4 years Saddam didn't comply - So after your country gets hit like that on 9/11, wouldn't it be more insane to NOT go after Saddam than to sit and wait for him to comply? It's a pretty easy defense for going into Iraq, but no one understands...
2006-08-16
15:47:42
·
18 answers
·
asked by
jdfehrenbach
1
in
Government