In Lebanon, Hezbollah enjoys membership in the government and has support of many locals – I've heard dozens interviewed on news clips, including NPR.
In the pseudo state of Palestine, the popular vote went to HAMAS – they own the government.
The modern altruist rules of engagement: (1) proportional death on both sides, (2) sacrifice your own soldiers, (3) discriminate between militants & civilians whilst firing from tanks & planes, risking your own men, and doing it when you don't necessarily have the technology of the US precision munitions, (4) have some overarching mission [democracy, freeing the people...] that justifies your own defense, and (5) never actually declare war; are as suicidal in practice as you would expect in theory.
Should war, once it [unfortunately] comes to that, be all out fight to win, decisively & swiftly?
2006-07-29
14:14:49
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics