Politics & Government - 16 July 2006

2006-07-16 22:20:17 · 5 answers · asked by panther_nut 3 in Other - Politics & Government

I mean we pay for a service were not using. That's wasting our hard earned money.I wouldn't mind it so much if we got something out of it. That's why the parents should pay. Not us single folks. Home school your children. It's cheaper on us single people. I just want to know what "service" we are getting. If I ever have a child, he or she wil be home schooled.

2006-07-16 22:20:11 · 7 answers · asked by Jim F 5 in Other - Politics & Government

2006-07-16 22:19:13 · 8 answers · asked by ron p 2 in Politics

2006-07-16 22:14:09 · 17 answers · asked by Happy 4 in Military

Sub contract all our nuclear processing to them. If we become a valuable customer there is no way they're gona nuke us....! We may even become buddies and then they will plant flowers instead of building bombs because thay have no enamies, just lots of lovely new friends....

2006-07-16 22:12:19 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

the male foreskin is quite large compared to the female foreskin.

it covers the whole glans and then some.

the female foreskin is quite small by comparison, covering the clitoris. some call it the 'clitoral hood'.

if this is the case, then why is foreskin removal banned for girls, but not boys?

based on the size alone, surely you would ban it first for boys.

because it is bigger, it also causes more pain to cut it off. another reason to ban it first for boys.

additionally, the foreskin plays a more prominant role in sex for males than for females. it contains about half of the nerve endings activated during sex for males.

for females' foreskins, this is not the case.

i am very glad at least one half of humanity, females, are protected from needless, routine sexual surgery. this has been around since the dawn of time for some reason and signifies a great leap for humanity in becoming civilised.

2006-07-16 22:12:03 · 5 answers · asked by Smegma Stigma 4 in Law & Ethics

2006-07-16 22:08:31 · 13 answers · asked by mahesh w 1 in Other - Politics & Government

2006-07-16 22:00:41 · 10 answers · asked by mahesh w 1 in Law Enforcement & Police

With Israeli and Lebanon attacks strikeing each other with missiles and the nuclear problems we are having with Iran and North Korea could this be the start of World War lll as other nations get involved.

2006-07-16 21:55:42 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

2006-07-16 21:53:55 · 16 answers · asked by mahesh w 1 in Law Enforcement & Police

2006-07-16 21:51:45 · 17 answers · asked by vin 2 in Law Enforcement & Police

Recent Bombay Blasts

2006-07-16 21:49:16 · 8 answers · asked by rajiv s 2 in Civic Participation

Up to this time no attempt is made to solve Isreal/Lebanon problem but those who are at the position to do so are more concern of evacuation. They should remember that this is not the way to handle this problem. It needs immediat attention, but instead the issue is being handled carelessly. This will really worsen the situatio.

2006-07-16 21:48:55 · 6 answers · asked by muzyne 3 in Military

2006-07-16 21:47:43 · 10 answers · asked by krisidious 2 in Politics

2006-07-16 21:45:37 · 6 answers · asked by mahesh w 1 in Law Enforcement & Police

and what gives a country the right to decide which counties could and could not have nuclear powers?
personally, i hope all the WMDs in the world would be destroyed but we all know thats not going to happen.
i think its a great hypocracy that a country like israel, which bashed all of the UN resolutions against it, and is in the mid east, a very volatile region, can have nuclear weopons and the world expects countries like iran to abandon nuclear programs.
its fair for other mid east countries to get nuclear programs just to create a balance of power.

2006-07-16 21:45:37 · 11 answers · asked by agh78 2 in Military

2006-07-16 21:42:44 · 9 answers · asked by varma the 4 ever 1 in Immigration

2006-07-16 21:40:38 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2006-07-16 21:38:18 · 17 answers · asked by krisidious 2 in Politics

Hey All

Firstly, before i start, this isnt a thread to attack either the Israelis actions in Labanon or Hezbollah's, thats for another time.

My question is, with the HMS Illustrious and the HMS Bulwark approaching Lebanon, would the Navy be justified in breaking the Israeli blockade to extract British nationals?
Let me explain. Their are several news channels following the actions minute by minute, such as the BBC and Euro News. A spokesperson from the Royal Navy said that she believed the Navy would be justified in forcing a break in Israels blockade as our Citizens are currently being bombed due to Israels campaign.

Do you believe the Navy will, and is justified to, break the Blockade in order to extract British Citizens?

Cheers

2006-07-16 21:34:51 · 9 answers · asked by thomas p 5 in Politics

2006-07-16 21:34:43 · 10 answers · asked by panther_nut 3 in Other - Politics & Government

I have a family member that has been a full time employee of a local company for many years (we'll call the company "Bigco"). When a one time job came up at Bigco, my relative referred me to his employer. I began the job right away - painting a laboratory on Bigco's grounds. This lab was an inside a warehouse. In this warehouse broken glass and water were on the floor throughout. During the course of my work day I reeled in a hose over the warehouse floor, in so doing I cut my hand. Two days later I was hospitalized with a life threatening infection - flesh eating bacteria. I am, almost wo months later, just now recovering. Is the owner of Bigco liable in any way since the orignal injury happened there?

2006-07-16 21:29:40 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

it seems obviace that we do not intemidate like we did post WW II look at N. Korea. and we seem to not be doing to good in Iraq.

2006-07-16 21:26:27 · 18 answers · asked by panther_nut 3 in Other - Politics & Government

I was drunk the cops came and made me walk in a line and I failed but they did not arrest me.

2006-07-16 21:25:20 · 22 answers · asked by darkraven_222000 1 in Law Enforcement & Police

as they are the real royals who inherit the presidency, i think in america big business, corrupt voting methods, the cia and all the clendenstine organisations run the usa. The people who vote do it as a formality. When will the REAL people in america get up and take the running of the country in their hands?Will we ever see a mutiny or a frech style revolution to throw these bureaucrats OUT?

2006-07-16 21:21:25 · 14 answers · asked by navinsohanpal 1 in Politics

Do you think that boat crews should be allowed to be armed to protect them and their cargo from pirates. Especially on cruise ships that would be a valueable target for pirates.

2006-07-16 21:20:34 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

we don't have agood food paths 4 the pedestrians to walk.sides of the roads r coveredwithdirty wastes papers etcwhile in america and other countries people are not allowed to put wastes in public places they have laws to practice this with why this is not happening in india

2006-07-16 21:20:05 · 4 answers · asked by jin 1 in Law & Ethics

This doesn't make sense to me. How do they achieve any world support attacking women and children? Plus, Israel is completely pissed, and they don't play.

2006-07-16 21:17:41 · 21 answers · asked by Capt Jack 2 in Politics

Like Mr.Bush has backed Israel for its selfdefence by war against Lebanon whick is not as dangerous as pakistan. And the recent incident where more than 200 people has been killed by bombing in Indias Commercial capitol "Mumbai" formarly "Bombay".

2006-07-16 21:16:43 · 5 answers · asked by Tipsy 2 in Military

I have posted a previous question so please refer to this. I just want to say that my daughter is my whole world I would never do anything to hurt her or put her in harms way. She is the only family I have and I would always put her safety and life before mine. It has been pretty upsetting reading some of the posts on here in reference to my question. I acknowledge that the hard shoulder is not the best place in the world to stop...I didn't need another 60 odd people in the world to tell me that. That is why I tried for a good 20 minutes to distract my daughter. I have never experienced her crying like that before and as time went on with me driving it just seemed to get worse. I became increasingly distressed and unfortunately I did start crying too because my daughter wouldn't stop. I would not allow my daughter to pass out if she was that upset...why would you think I would let that happen? I cannot be sure I was driving safely (continues in details)…

2006-07-16 21:14:03 · 19 answers · asked by bottle247 1 in Law Enforcement & Police