2006-07-16 22:20:17 · 5 answers · asked by panther_nut 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
LOL the terrorists were the peopel who through the tea off a boat, then came back the day later to pay the owner for a lock on on of the boxes they broke...
Some call it a boston tea party, Hard to believe that use to be all it took to get peoples attention.
2006-07-16 22:33:38 · answer #1 · answered by profit0004 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
To the British he would have been considered a traitor to the crown but not a terrorist. A terrorist is one who uses terror to further their own political ends and at worse Revere would have been thought to be guilty of treason and hung for it, if the colonists had lost, but never a terrorist.
2006-07-17 05:32:17 · answer #2 · answered by mjlehde@sbcglobal.net 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't recall Paul Revere killing any little kids or hacking the heads off of any adults so... no. I don't thinks so.
2006-07-17 05:25:00 · answer #3 · answered by claymore 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No a terrorist is someone who uses terror to get what they want. he simply warned his countrymen and neighbors that the british where on the march.
2006-07-17 05:24:18 · answer #4 · answered by Joel E 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he didn't hurt any civilians.
2006-07-17 05:25:02 · answer #5 · answered by michinoku2001 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋