thx for the comments in "part I" question,,
My defence --
everyone who read it,,got confused abt what i compared on,,and u have focused on what i compared with!
i compared things on their 'abstract' property!
i can prove santa doesn't exist through my method!
-->
Santa's absence won't question the existence of the universe!
but absense of god,,or say absense of mathematics would definately do!
another example-
do dragons exists?
dragons and mathematics r both abstracts!
but absense of dragon's won't question the existence of universe,,unlike that of absense of mathematics would surely do!
i studied on this,,,and it is not that easy to refute my idea!
remember,,i m comparing abstracts to abstracts,,
all having same causes and effects!mostly,,compare an abstract with mathematics,,if they follow same conditions as mathematics do, they exists!
if u say mathematics is not abstract,,what is "complex numbers"? mathematics is stronger than beliefs,,(continued)...
2007-12-26
21:43:28
·
11 answers
·
asked by
gunkedar
2
in
Philosophy