I've heard them all. And these are excuses. If you have to explain why you are wrong the majority of the time, it is an EXCUSE, not an explanation.
GDP RANK WITH SOURCE
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AoHfF5mmChD2IRQlJY7k_t_sy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071113112546AA1xtbO
1) It takes 4, 8, and even 12 years for a president's policies to take effect. That's why Reagan is responsible for the growth seen under Clinton. However, Carter and Clinton had absolutely nothing to do with the growth seen under Reagan and Bush Jr.
2) Reagan was responsible for the growth under Clinton, but he was not responsible for the Bush Sr recession.
3) Just because the economy tends to do better under Democrats, does not imply cause and effect, unless you are talking about Republicans and tax cuts, then it is definitely cause and effect.
4) The Republican congress was responsible for the Clinton growth, but the Democratic congress under Reagan was not responsible for the Reagan growth.
2007-11-13
07:44:00
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics