why do women get so angry when the man gets full custody?

Question

i mean the tables have finally turned, the men are getting custody these days and the woman are paying child support and getting mad about it, why is that

Answer 1

It's been a long time coming but the courts are finally realizing that just because you're a woman doesn't mean you are the better parent to your child or children. I know several Dad's who are raising their kids and doing a qreat job and the children are happier than they were before. If the Mothers would just accept it and quit bad mouthing everyone in the childs life everytime they get to visit, the kids wouldn't mind seeing their Mom nearly as bad.

Answer 2

Because it's a threat to them. When a woman has a child and it's one experiance that men will never understand. It's a bonding with the child. When a father takes from the mother it is crucial. I don't think it has anything to do with Child Support. It has to do with the child and the mother feels she is losing her baby.

Men just don't understand anything about how the woman feels.

Now if the sitation is poor with the mother then that's a whole different story. If she is abusive and the father is not then of course it's better if the child is better off with the father. But if the Father is taking aways from the mother because he is angry with her and just because then that is flat out wrong.

Answer 3

Because they carried the child for 9 months, went through excruciating pain, bled, gained weight, and now they can't even have custody of their child.
Not saying that all mothers deserve this custody... because some mothers are horrible and neglecting parents but i'm just guessing that's why a woman would be upset if she didn't have custody of her child.

Answer 4

Same reason a man gets so angry with the woman gets full custody.

Answer 5

The mom has a connection with the child a man could never had. They went through nine months of labor, they gave birth which im sure is EXCRUCIATING. Also in most cases mothers tend to be more sensitive and easy to talk to. However you may have been the better candidate and more able to take care of your child. If this is the case than i applaud you.

Answer 6

If it's in the child's best interest to be with dad, then I don't see a problem with it. I think the thing that most people get caught up in is that, historically, it's been the mother who is the 'nurturer.' That isn't always the case anymore, though.

Answer 7

i dont think they are mad at the dad people hear about it and as a woman i get upset that a woman who carried her child for 9 months gave birth to them and then just abandon them upsets me knowing that there priorities have changed and they dont have an emotional bond with the child it is completely unreal too me

Answer 8

nicely i'm sorry I dont be attentive to your united states of america's regulations for divorce...yet even only out of uncomplicated experience and presuming i develop right into a decide on your united states of america i might nonetheless not positioned you and your babies on street with the aid of fact he needs it back whether it develop into under own loan...the two he could be made to pay the relax of the non-public loan quantity or considering the fact which you're self sufficient to pay the non-public loan the abode might get carry of to you and your babies..So dont subject...i think of likely this humanitarian judgement could be useful there in the decide's techniques there additionally and the determination might bypass on your favour. good success and please submit me on the subject of the determination...i think for you and your babies...God Bless.

Answer 9

bc the bond between child and mother is so precious....it's also hard for the father tho and i understand how it seems to guys. as a mom, i knoow that it would kill me, her dad doesn't seem to have aproblem not seeing her let alone custody. i guess a counter question would be, how can dad's act like their child never existed???

Answer 10

I guess for the same reasons some men do.