I really can't understand why people are getting so upset at Marbury for his comments on Michael Vick. I mean he is right. If Michael Vick went on a hunting trip and shot a deer, there would be no issue. And it is the SAME THING. In both cases, you are killing an animal. Who cares about the means. Whether you shoot a deer or take a dog and tie to a tree, beat it and eventually drown it, in the end you have killed an animal. And it really is a sport. I mean they show hunting as a sport. The act of hunting game & Killing animals, and it is considered a sport. So this is killing animals, why is this not a sport? Not to mention those nature shows. You know how brutally a leopard kills a zebra? But do you see them on trial or being exterminated because of their cruelty? NO!!! So why are we putting Vick on trial? I think that Vick is a trail blazer and I applaud Marbury for coming out and recognizing that.
2007-08-23
01:55:21
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Basketball