Why did those anti-U.S. French elect a pro-U.S. president?
E-mail this page Reader Comments (below)
By M.D. Harmon Portland Press Herald Friday, May 11, 2007
I guess this is the end of freedom fries, not to mention any remaining sentiment to boycott French wines or certain fragant cheeses.
Instead, we should raise a glass of vintage Chardonnay or even Champagne to toast the victory Sunday of a new French president, who without any hesitation said during his entire campaign that it was time to repair relations with "our good friends, the Americans."
Nicholas Sarkozy, 52, is the son of Hungarian immigrants and a law-and-order economic conservative. He soundly beat the Socialist Party nominee, 53-year-old SÈgolËne Royal.
It's tempting to cast the race in American terms, seeing Sarkozy as a combination of George W. Bush, John McCain and Rudy Giuliani, with a dash of Fred Thompson thrown in.
Indeed, Sarkozy outraged his leftist critics by visiting the United States during the campaign and being photographed shaking Bush's hand.
In that paradigm, Royal becomes (who else?) Hillary ("don't call me Rodham") Clinton -- especially since the Frenchwoman, finding that her "stay-the-collapsing-welfare-state-course" message was failing to get traction, played the gender card at the end, asking women to vote for her as France's first female leader.
That would leave aside Joan of Arc, but that's not a comparison worth taking too far.
It may or may not be a lesson for Hillary boosters that the appeal to les femmes didn't work.
Sarkozy got 53 percent of the total vote and 52 percent of the women's vote, showing that feminist solidarity comes up a bit short when unemployment's soaring and tout le mond wonders why so many of your young people think that if Paris isn't burning, it's not for lack of effort on their part.
As a Wall Street Journal analysis noted Wednesday, voters expect a woman candidate to meet a higher standard for toughness and leadership. The story quoted Democratic pollster Peter Hart as saying, "One of the challenges is that 'commander in chief' is so much of the job description."
There are those who have tried to downplay this vote, and in some media outlets, coverage of Paris Hilton's scrapes with a drunken-driving charge took precedence over Paris, France's decision to go with the old free-market vintage as opposed to sipping another soupÁon of socialism.
Closing one's eyes won't make reality go away, however.
This reality indicates, among many other things, that all those people who have been telling us for years that the French really hate Americans may have been confusing France's highly anti-American media with the actual sentiments of the people.
Of course, Sarkozy wasn't elected entirely, or even primarily, on his pro-American views. He took a strong stand against rioters in both immigrant (read: Muslim) neighborhoods, where the youth unemployment rate tops 40 percent, and in Paris, where spoiled university students spilled into the streets to protest a law that would have allowed their future employers to dismiss them if they couldn't do their jobs.
That sounds odd to U.S. ears, but such productivity-strangling laws are common in the socialist-influenced societies of Europe. They are places where, when the government promises to take care of you from the cradle to the grave, it changes your diapers and drops the lid on your coffin.
Sarkozy promised to restore the abandoned dismissal law and make it easier to start small businesses. He vowed to crack down on immigrant rioters, who still protested his election, ironically unable (yet, at least) to see that his policies offer them the best hope they've ever had of escaping France's economic doldrums.
Now, conservative leaders expressing a wish for greater friendships with America have been elected not only in France, but in Germany (Angel Merkel, 2005), Canada (Stephen Harper, 2006) and Mexico (Felipe CalderÛn, 2006).
With Tony Blair's departure as British prime minister next month, this nation loses a great friend, but where his successor, Gordon Brown, will take the country remains to be seen.
That overall trend, however, not only casts the complaints of our own limpid leftists about our support abroad in a somewhat different light, it has very good implications for the struggle against jihadist terrorists in the near future.
The hope of further progress in that fight is perhaps the clearest benefit of Sarkozy's election --demonstrating the clarity of the French in seeing what danger confronts them.
As Walid Phares, author of "The War of Ideas: Jihadism against Democracy," wrote this week, Sarkozy's victory is a response to a plea his predecessors ignored: "Please resist the rise of terror that is the urban jihad."
"This is not just another European election," Phares wrote, "it is a benchmark in the Western struggle to win the war on terror."
We can hope the odds of victory took a big leap on Sunday.
2007-05-12
02:42:51
·
10 answers
·
asked by
GREAT_AMERICAN
1
in
Politics