It's really a rhetorical question, but I'm interested in your responses. Take ID, for example. ID doesn't imply the God of traditional theism; ID could well be accounted for by the kind of systems theory proposed here:
http://www.amazon.com/Interconnected-Universe-Conceptual-Foundations-Transdisciplinary/dp/9810222025/sr=8-1/qid=1170856749/ref=sr_1_1/102-5478643-1795354?ie=UTF8&s=books
Note that this kind of integration of systems, complexity, and quantum theory is a *naturalistic* explanation of anomalous phenomena appearing across disciplines, including quantum physics, cosmology, biology, and consciousness studies.
When you resort to a priori dismissal of anomalous phenomena for the sake of adherence to your paradigm, you impede the work of genuine science. Reality may not be what you think it is (in fact, if the history of science is any indicator, it certainly isn't), but that doesn't mean that traditional religion is right, either.
2007-02-07
01:03:22
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality