Did President Bush's government orchestrate 9/11?

Question

I am from the UK and would like to know what our cousins from the US think.

Answer 1

The Wording of your question suggest you have done some research of your own, as you pinpoint those in our government who may have planned and executed the deed: We call them Bush's NeoCon gang.

Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny.

FAKE CONFESSION
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg

EVIDENCE
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM

Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=

Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid. Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7; the one no jet ever hit.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ

FORENSICS
A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_charges.html

CONFESSION
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329

MOTIVE
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

OPPORTUNITY
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA

__________________________________

There is also strong evidence to support a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior armed with a missile hit the Pentagon. One thing we can be certain about; it was not a Boeing 757, as our government claims. Listen to this retired General, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon...?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

One might expect to see three holes in the pentagon, one for the main body and two more for each engine. The engine and engine parts were found outside of the building, they never penetrated the building thus no hole was created by them. The deep 18 foot hole was most probably made by an on board missile and not the aircraft itself. A radiation expert claims high-radiation readings near the Pentagon indicates depleted uranium (DU) munitions may have been used.
http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.htm

Witnesses say, the U.S. military secretly had Raytheon Co. refit an A-3 Skywarrior with new jet engines, a missile, and a Global Hawk guidance system, just prior to 9/11. Coincidentally, five key executives of Raytheon Co. went missing on 9/11. The official word is they died in the hijacked planes on 9/11.
http://tomflocco.com/fs/WitnessesLink.htm

The Jet engine(s) found may be key to identifying what type of aircraft hit the Pentagon: At the very least, they help determine a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. Both the jet engine housing as well as a "front end rotor head" have been identified as belonging to a Pratt & Whitney JT8D jet engine. The P&W JT8D engine has been used on the smaller Boeing 727 as well as a retrofit for the A-3 Skywarior. Two P&W JT8D's do not provide enough thrust to get a Boeing 757 off the ground much less sufficient power to perform the military precision maneuvers the aircraft in question did.
http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm
http://www.karlschwarz.com/02-02-05_Schwarz.pdf

A photograph of a cracked windshield found at the crash site strongly resembles the top canopy glass found on the Skywarrior: No windows of this shape are found on a Boeing 757.
http://home.att.net/~carlson.jon/911Pentagon.htm

The landing gear is one part found in the crash site that may be linked to a Boeing 757. It could also be a part that was retrofitted on an A-3 Skywarrior, since the wheels would most likely need to be replaced with something still available.
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/084.html

A geometric analysis can show the aircraft that hit the Pentagon is under 85 feet long and therefore too small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 feet long. An A-3 Skywarrior is 76 feet 4 inches long. See geometric analysis: also see revision note under comments.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Avt4N5qfsIKkwbXeL7iLXmPsy6IX?qid=20061122203115AAj8XR6

Answer 2

I believe there's a new film out which tries to tie together all the main conspiracy theories including:

not a plane that hit the pentagon
The towers were bought down by controlled explosions not the planes.
Flight 93 (?) actually landed on an airbase and the people were carted away..
etc.

I read an article on either the Time or Guardian websites and the conclusion is that its a just a conspiracy theory:

The new film doesn't actually interview any surveyors/explosive experts just a janitor and security guards at the tower. (Admitedly I've not seen the film). And also points out the number of people who would be involved in such a conspiracy...

Besides does anyone thing that Bush could actually orchestrate a bunch of kids with triangles, let alone anything that needs thousands of people to be involved and kept quiet! The man probably can't even spell 9/11...

Hmm bit of a rant there - but I don't really buy it...

Answer 3

Understand actions that could defend yourself or anyone who you attention is always anything great so if you considered understanding some martial artwork but not a thing to complicated here is the place https://tr.im/VuLyz  the web program Patriot Self Defense .
With Patriot Self Defense you'll learn practices, methods, measures plan and more, all to be able to defend anyone at any time.
Patriot Self Defense is the greatest online program, a distinctive program that helps you in this most vitally issue -keep safe.

Answer 4

As fun as it might be to be a conspiracy theorist, I kinda doubt that the president orchestrated 9/11. What would be the point? At that very same time ENRON was being shut down (a big economic smack in the face) but the American citizens didn't find out about it until months afterwards just to keep our economy relatively stabilized from 9/11. My answer - no, no, and... no.

Answer 5

Well..Ive heard and read theories that the US govt may have had something to do with it..but it remains as something that has to be proven. Until then..I quite frankly dont believe it to be true. Im not an American but as an Asian watching cable tv and reading about it on the net and in the tabloids ( was in Brunei at the time it happened... watching it all on the tube when I first gaped in abosolute shock! )..I was so appalled and confused on how the US govt could have missed the chance to stop or possibly shoot down those two planes...but there again I am not fully read on what really happened on that fateful day on a September morning. Maybe something happened that didnt allow such measures to be taken in time to prevent that massacre from happening. In conclusion...nah. I dont think the US Govt had anything to do with it. Period.

Answer 6

People allow their political hatred to cloud their good judgement. There is no way that Bush was involved. Consider this: a lot of the people who have left the Bush White House have written books about their experiences. Imagine how much publicity and money they would get if they came out and said that Bush was behind it. No one could keep a secret that big for very long.

Also consider all of the events that happened that day and the days and months leading up to that day. There is no way that it could be an inside job without more people knowing about it.

Answer 7

I think Bush is a despicable murderer, but I don't think so. I mean, nothing was gained from it in the long run... yeah, he saw a quick rise in popularity right after the attacks but now we just see that he wasn't able to capture the acutal culprit and tried to use Iraq as a scape goat, which failed miserably...

Besides, the game people claim responsibility for the London and Madrid bombings and I have faith that if Bushie did those the British Government would know... the US may have the best Armed Forces, but you can't beat British Intelligence.

Just my humble opinion.

Answer 8

I am from Nigeria and i strongly believe that he did it for the following reasons.

1. To garner popularity for his government which recorded the lowest popularity rating within the shortest period of time ever in the history of United States.

2. To carryout the long orchestrated plan by America to conquer the Midlle east and eventually Islam.

3. To secure more oil blocks for his associates' oil companies in the oil rich Iraq.

4. To justify the claims that America was truly attacked by "enemies" of America who are Muslims and Arabs.

5. To topple Saddam, which the Bush family believed was the only last unfinished business of the 1990 gulf war.

Answer 9

I cannot stand Bush, but I do not think that even he is low enough to murder thousands of innocent Americans just to get a few approval rating points. Wait - that is happening right now in Iraq. However, he is not smart enough to orchestrate something of this magnitude. This is a myth.

Answer 10

That question answers itself:

__did he need 911 to invade Iraq or Afghanistan? --no, we probably would have done that anyway.
__to what advantage? Bush's ratings continue to fall, most Americans now know that Bush hasn't been exactly honest with us since 911 (duh! I was once called a liberal for believing that)
__more and more US groups are echoing other's opinions that Bush should be impeached
___some of the kids fighting and dying in Iraq are kids of high government officials in the Congress and Senate.
__many of the so called "facts" in Farenheit 911 were not facts at all, (no, I'm not a Republican,I'm a democrat,so don't even go there.) All Farenheit 911 made clear was that our president isn't the sharpest nail in the bucket (nor are his advisors.) We didn't need a half baked, half true movie to tell us that.

....so Bush did it to derail his own Presidency and public opinion? Hmmmm, ok...so now excuse me while I get back on my spaceship and go to my home planet! Nano-Nano!

PS "Buck Flair" below, has so many flawed facts it's not funny. ....but let me mention just one. My company had offices in two of the buildings that surrounded the towers and offices in tower 2. We lost 11 people that day. What clearly brought down one of the surrounding buildings (Bldg 7) and damaged the building that we re-opened (and we have photos to prove it) was the EXTREME damage from the blown out debris when the towers fell. The towers didn't just fall straight down. When each of the towers fell, debris from the fall invaded the lower floors of ALL of the surrounding buildings, bringing some of them down as well. The only reason they didn't ALL come down was because of their proximity to the T1 and T2 debris fields. ....please people, get real and don't believe every "conspiracy theory" that comes down the pike. Just because you see it on a web-page (or movie) somewhere doesn't make it so. Have we forgotten how to think for ourselves?

A good source to review, which debunks "Flairs" and "Joe Pardy's" assumptions is http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm , which covers claims like "jet fuel can't melt steel" and "building 7 was pulled", "quips of smoke in the video are evidence of charges going off", "the planes weren't really jetliners" (I love that one!)

I guess the hundreds of cell phone calls from dozens of people on board all 4 of the planes lost that day...the calls from loved ones, even AS the planes were hitting the towers, the field, and the Pentagon building... were fake too? Please !!

The link shows great photographic evidence regarding other conspiracy theories too numerous to mention here. It's a great source.

I just wish conspiracy theorists would use some logical thinking skills and examine the facts....but that might require too much time. Simply believing something because someone said so is a dangerous way to live. Look at all the facts.

Answer 11

Yes, Bush orchestrated 9/11. It is a fact that Bush and Cheney have business partnerships with the Bin Laden family. So, they know Osama Bin Laden personally.
The CIA also supplied Bin Laden and the Taliban with arms and money in the Afghan War against the Soviets. Furthermore, the 9/11 Commission Report was written by people selected by Bush. This is to cover-up the actual events of 9/11. This is the reason why a lot of dubious questions remain unanswered by the commission's report.