I think I should draw a chart here:
Hydrogen+Oxygen+Carbon+Nitrogen > Organic compounds > Unicellular organisms > Multicellular organisms > Monkeys (or if some evolutionists don't agree then common ancestor) > Homo Erectus > Homo Sapiens (humans).
As to the Billthedude's point, if we take god out of equation and we still do not know the beginning of the universe, its true, we are not sure what produced that initial big mass of matter. But my question would be that if we can't believe in evolution simply because it sounds too incredible that man evolved from simple organic compounds then how can you assume the existence of god, someone superior to man, with omni-scient, omni-present and omni-potent attributes. Is it not a contradiction in terms not to believe in someone inferior simply to substitute him with a fantastic and incomprehensible superior?
2006-09-08
10:56:45
·
20 answers
·
asked by
Rustic
4
in
Religion & Spirituality