What is your opinion of this? Terrorists aren't soldiers, but can commit warcrimes?
What sort of legal definition should terrorists have?
Right now, it's like they are subhuman, but if so, does any court have validity passing sentence on them?
(in my view, terrorist organisations are like international mafias, bent on intimidation and such, and should be considered criminals, while their militant arms should be considered soldiers, and given the respect due to enemy soldiers.)
2006-09-08
00:01:32
·
6 answers
·
asked by
dane
4
in
Law & Ethics