Today Mcgrath took 3 wickets for 18, Tait took 4 for 39! Taits is considered the better performance. I understand that it goes by wickets taken but it seems ludicrous to me that it doesn't go by an average system! I know I am only a mere woman and a Scots one at that and I really shouldn't have the audacity to question this historical way of determining who bowls best, but it just seems a wee bit stupid to me?
Apologies to the people on my contacts list who will be thinking What the!!!!?
2007-04-25
10:33:59
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Cricket