Often when questions get brought up regarding the 2nd Amendment and besides the poorly written reply that "Dude, y would ou need one?" there is always the comment: "You don't (insert gun that isn't some expensive hunting rifle) need them to go hunting."
Do you people honestly believe that the 2nd Amendment was about hunting? have we come that far from our heritage to think that hunting, not defense against tyrants, thugs, and invaders is a more valid reason?
So here's the gauntlet, I want all the people here who have no qualms about gun bans to present a strong case. I'm guessing this will be very entertaining to say the least.
2007-04-20
15:32:33
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Hunting