samoa joe has had such a long winning streak up until kurt angle defeated him at TNA, but would he have faired well in the WWE and is he really as good as everyone says he is? i personally think that had he been wrestling in the WWE, things would've been different. for starters, wrestling is generally fake and the storylines are fake, plus the writers would not go along with the idea of him remaining undefeated and hence, he would not have had back to back victories as easily as he does in TNA. secondly, the range of wrestlers on WWE will be a different kettle of fish to TNA. if you put aside all the criticisms and flak towards the WWE, and consider how he would fare against the likes of Kane and the undertaker, some would say that the likes of these two are in a different league to the TNA wrestlers.
therefore, would samoa joe been as successful if he had been a WWE wrestler, as opposed to a TNA one?
2006-12-17
22:09:34
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Wrestling