samoa joe has had such a long winning streak up until kurt angle defeated him at TNA, but would he have faired well in the WWE and is he really as good as everyone says he is? i personally think that had he been wrestling in the WWE, things would've been different. for starters, wrestling is generally fake and the storylines are fake, plus the writers would not go along with the idea of him remaining undefeated and hence, he would not have had back to back victories as easily as he does in TNA. secondly, the range of wrestlers on WWE will be a different kettle of fish to TNA. if you put aside all the criticisms and flak towards the WWE, and consider how he would fare against the likes of Kane and the undertaker, some would say that the likes of these two are in a different league to the TNA wrestlers.
therefore, would samoa joe been as successful if he had been a WWE wrestler, as opposed to a TNA one?
2006-12-17 22:09:34 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
it took a wwe guy to beat him
kurt rules!!
john cena will smack down umaga!!
and no, samoa joe would lose to the undertaker
or to chris benoit or batista
all three rocked armageddon
tna is not the same as wwe
wwe has more history ,more variety and definitely more stars
season's greetings
2006-12-17 22:29:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Well according to my friend in Denver Samoa had to lose to Kurt at Genesis.It was Angle's 1st match & it was a sweetener if you like.Welcome to TNA let's get you a win over the undefeated Samoa!
Samoa is pretty much like Umaga. On a roll practically unbeatable & great things beckoning in the near future. Kane & Taker are brawlers - Samoa is more of a technical wrestler. The Bros of Destruction have the mass appeal & charisma. Over on TNA the big draws are Christian & Styles.
2006-12-18 20:18:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
well you are way of the mark there, there is no difference what so ever between the two company's, wrestling is a entertainment business the winners of the match's are decided before hand, the wrestler that go on undefeated streaks are giving that story line to get over with the fans, any one can beat anyone in the wrestling business no matter what company they work for its a show bizz to make money, dont you understand this, here is an example if they really did fight for real there is no way the like's of ray myterio would be beat guys like JBL or the big show the way he did, its the powers to be that deside who win's and who does not win
2006-12-18 15:28:50 · answer #3 · answered by rusty red 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
wrestling is a complex sport in the armatures where there is nothing phony about it.
professional wrestling is equally complex in that, like stunt men, every move needs to be practised until perfect. when the public watches they see the finished product. make no mistake. each performance is in peril until it is finished. there are times when a real fight breaks out because somebody missed their que. at other times performers are killed either because of poor timing or equipment failure.
Samoan Joe is a good professional wrestler. in the wwe, he might not have had as long a winning streak because the wwe spares no expense to have the very best.
2006-12-18 06:30:34 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes he would due to the fact that umaga was only created when samoa joe reject an offer from the wwe and signed bk with tna
2006-12-18 09:06:06 · answer #5 · answered by Gavin C 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
WWE offered him a contract a while ago but Joe turned it down because he wants to help TNA rise and rival WWE but Vince didn't like his decision so he created his own version of Joe....Umaga.I think Joe would of been a top dog in WWE because there isn't much talent in there so he would of rose quickly but I'm glad he stayed in TNA,don't forget there is going to be a lot more talent and competition in TNA soon when most of the good wrestlers in WWE come to TNA like Rey Mysterio,Benoit,RVD,Sabu and more.
2006-12-18 09:54:48 · answer #6 · answered by HHH 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
nah. joe isnt in the same class as wwe superstars. he may be a main eventer at tna but in the wwe, he will be a mid card or even a pre show deark match wrestler
2006-12-18 07:38:57 · answer #7 · answered by ™ 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
yes Samoa Joe remained undefeated in WWE coz just look at Umaga he's undefeated and will defeat Cena at New Year Revolution.
If i would be Vince i would promote Samoa and keep him in Smackdown! and make a match between them at WrestleMania
Smackdown's Undefeated Samoa Joe vs RAW's Undefeated Umaga
2006-12-18 06:19:30 · answer #8 · answered by RatedR RtZmE (KFC OFC PAC) 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No cause if he went on raw HHH Umaga or John cena would beat him and if he went on smackdown Batista Undertaker or Kane would beat him like a b***h
2006-12-18 09:37:55 · answer #9 · answered by Mudda g 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
no! tna isn't even in wwe's league!
he wouldn't have lasted one minuite in the wwe! he'd have gotten his but whipped!
2006-12-19 17:39:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋