How do you reconcile the fact that there is no proof that there is no God, and the necessity of faith to that effect with utter adherence to reason and rejection of faith? It seems to me like a self-contained contradiction which, at heart, seems to embody all of those things you stand against.
It's axiomatic to say that since there is no science on the subject of God, or on the subject of whether or not he/she/it/shmizmar exists, that there is no rational position, for or against his/her/its/shimizmarrin existence. This, at best, paints you in a slightly unfavorable and hypocritical light, and at worst makes you out to be flagrantly, and deliberately denying that which you embrace in defiance of reason.
So which is it? Are you honestly really Atheists? Or are you deep down Anti-Theist agnostics? And if you -are- Atheists, will you admit that this requires faith and conviction without evidence?
2007-10-28
11:53:21
·
20 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous